The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Ohio bill bans out-of-state drivers without legal status and mandates Attorney General lawsuits
Last action · March 4, 2026: Referred to Public SafetySponsor: Adam Bird
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
Ohio House Bill 722 prohibits nonresidents who are unlawfully present in the United States from operating motor vehicles on Ohio highways, even if they hold a valid license from another state. Violating this prohibition is a first-degree misdemeanor under strict liability. Law enforcement must notify federal immigration authorities of violations, and the Ohio Attorney General is required to sue licensing states in the U.S. Supreme Court under specific accident and conviction conditions.
The measure creates a first-degree misdemeanor for out-of-state drivers lacking legal presence who operate vehicles in Ohio and obligates the state attorney general to initiate interstate litigation in federal court when accidents meet specific injury or property damage thresholds.
- Ohio Revised Code sections 4507.04 and 5502.11 govern nonresident driving privileges and motor vehicle accident reporting requirements within the state. context
- The 136th Ohio General Assembly convened for the 2025-2026 legislative session, during which House Bill 722 was introduced. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Nonresidents unlawfully present in the United States
Individuals without legal presence are prohibited from driving on Ohio highways and face first-degree misdemeanor charges for violations.
Law enforcement officers and agencies
Officers must send violation citations to federal immigration authorities, and local agencies must forward accident reports exceeding one thousand dollars to the director of public safety.
Attorney General
The office is required to file specific causes of action in the United States Supreme Court against licensing states under designated accident conditions.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does having a valid driver's license from another state exempt an unlawfully present nonresident from the Ohio ban?
What happens if a law enforcement officer issues a citation for this violation?
Under what conditions must the Ohio Attorney General sue another state?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
2 actions- Mar 4, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Public Safety
- Mar 3, 2026HouseIntroducedIntroduced
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Mandatory Interstate Litigation
The bill introduces a statutory mandate compelling the state attorney general to initiate original jurisdiction lawsuits in the United States Supreme Court against licensing states under specific accident criteria.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.legislature.ohio.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy80Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz50Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools