The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas revises joint planning requirements for groundwater management and desired future conditions
Last action · June 20, 2025: Effective on 9/1/25Sponsors: Stan Gerdes and 2 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
Texas groundwater conservation districts must now include plain-language explanations of how they track and achieve in their management plans, effective September 1, 2025.
Changes transparency and planning duties for groundwater districts, requiring them to report district performance and explain changes to aquifer conditions in plain language.
- Groundwater conservation districts in Texas are local special districts tasked with managing and protecting underground water resources. context
- Desired future conditions are established through joint planning among districts within the same groundwater management area to guide long-term water availability planning. context
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
groundwater conservation districts
Groundwater conservation districts must update their management plans to include plain-language performance explanations and adhere to revised joint planning and reporting procedures.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must groundwater conservation districts add to their management plans under this law?
How often must district representatives meet for joint planning?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Current status: Signed into law.
Procedural history
52 actions- Jun 20, 2025Governor of TexasEnrolledEffective on 9/1/25
- Jun 20, 2025Governor of TexasEnrolledSigned by the Governor
- May 30, 2025Governor of TexasEnrolledSent to the Governor
- May 28, 2025SenateSigned in the Senate
- May 28, 2025HouseSigned in the House
- May 28, 2025HouseReported enrolled
Show 46 earlier actions
- May 28, 2025HouseSenate passage reported
- May 28, 2025SenatePlaced on local & uncontested calendar
- May 27, 2025SenateFloorRecord vote
- May 27, 2025SenateFloorPassed
- May 27, 2025SenateFloorRead 3rd time
- May 27, 2025SenateFloorRecord vote
- May 27, 2025SenateThree day rule suspended
- May 27, 2025SenateVote recorded in Journal
- May 27, 2025SenateFloorRead 2nd time & passed to 3rd reading
- May 27, 2025SenateRules suspended-Regular order of business
- May 27, 2025SenatePlaced on intent calendar
- May 23, 2025SenateCommittee report printed and distributed
- May 23, 2025SenateRecommended for local & uncontested calendar
- May 23, 2025SenateCommitteeReported favorably w/o amendments
- May 23, 2025SenateVote taken in committee
- May 23, 2025SenateTestimony taken in committee
- May 23, 2025SenateConsidered in public hearing
- May 23, 2025SenateScheduled for public hearing on . . .
- May 22, 2025SenatePosting rule suspended
- May 22, 2025SenateCommitteeReferred to Water, Agriculture, & Rural Affairs
- May 22, 2025SenateIntroducedRead first time
- May 19, 2025SenateReceived from the House
- May 16, 2025HouseReported engrossed
- May 16, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- May 16, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#2863)
- May 16, 2025HouseFloorPassed
- May 16, 2025HouseFloorRead 3rd time
- May 15, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- May 15, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#2753)
- May 15, 2025HouseFloorPassed to engrossment as amended
- May 15, 2025HouseAmended (1-Gerdes)
- May 15, 2025HouseFloorRead 2nd time
- May 12, 2025HousePlaced on General State Calendar
- May 10, 2025HouseConsidered in Calendars
- May 8, 2025HouseCommittee report sent to Calendars
- May 7, 2025HouseCommittee report distributed
- May 7, 2025HouseComte report filed with Committee Coordinator
- May 2, 2025HouseCommitteeReported favorably w/o amendment(s)
- May 2, 2025HouseConsidered in formal meeting
- Apr 30, 2025HouseLeft pending in committee
- Apr 30, 2025HouseTestimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
- Apr 30, 2025HouseConsidered in public hearing
- Apr 30, 2025HouseScheduled for public hearing on . . .
- Mar 14, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to Natural Resources
- Mar 14, 2025HouseIntroducedRead first time
- Jan 24, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
HB 2078 was passed
Total
128
- Yes
- 95
- No
- 17
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 2
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 14
How they voted (128)
104 more members
Show 1 earlier roll call
HB 2078 , as amended, was passed to engrossment
Total
144
- Yes
- 117
- No
- 14
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 8
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 5
How they voted (144)
120 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Plain-Language Reporting Mandate
The legislation shifts groundwater district reporting standards by explicitly requiring plain-language explanations of performance tracking regarding desired future conditions.
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy15Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
