The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Minnesota House Bill 592 Directs Department of Human Services to Survey Applicants and Report on Public Assistance Improvements
Last action · February 13, 2025: Introduction and first reading, referred to Human Services Finance and PolicySponsor: Duane Quam
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
The Minnesota commissioner of human services must develop a customer service survey for and applicants by October 1, 2025, and submit a comprehensive report with legislative recommendations to the legislature by November 1, 2026.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Medical assistance applicants
Long-term services and supports applicants
Lead agencies
Lead agencies must collaborate with the commissioner to develop the survey, consult on the report, and implement unified administration standards.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
When is the final report due to the legislature?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
1 action- Feb 13, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduction and first reading, referred to Human Services Finance and Policy
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.revisor.mn.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools