POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Legislature shields public records requesters' identities and bans search fees

Original title: FOIA Database

Last action · January 14, 2026: To House JudiciarySponsors: Tresa Howell and 10 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Individuals submitting Freedom of Information Act requests gain guaranteed privacy with their personal identities kept confidential and exempt from public disclosure. Public bodies are banned from charging search or retrieval fees, while the Secretary of State must maintain an online request database and unlawful disclosures carry damages up to $5,000.

Why it matters

People seeking public records gain protection from search fees and exposed personal data within 90 days of enactment while public agencies must overhaul request tracking.

Background
  • The West Virginia Freedom of Information Act governs public access to records held by state and local government bodies. context
  • Delegates including T. Howell introduced House Bill 4163 during the 2026 regular legislative session. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Individuals submitting FOIA requests

Their names and identifying details become legally confidential and exempt from public disclosure, and they can seek damages up to $5,000 for unlawful disclosure.

Directly affected

Custodians of public records

They must redact original requesters' names from records, protect requester identities, respond within five days, and refrain from charging search or man-hour fees.

Directly affected

Secretary of State

Must maintain an online electronic database of request notices and update all online FOIA databases within 90 days to comply with confidentiality rules.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a public body charge me search or retrieval fees to find documents?
No. The bill explicitly prohibits public bodies from charging a search or retrieval fee or seeking reimbursement on a man-hour basis, allowing only fees reasonably calculated to cover actual reproduction costs.
What happens if my personal information as a requester is unlawfully disclosed?
Affected requesters may seek and damages of up to $5,000 per violation if their personal information is unlawfully disclosed.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Jan 14, 2026HouseCommittee
    To House Judiciary
  2. Jan 14, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House
  3. Jan 14, 2026HouseCommittee
    To Judiciary
  4. Jan 14, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Prohibition of Search and Retrieval Fees

The legislation removes the ability of public bodies to bill requesters for staff time spent searching or retrieving public records.

Connected Entities

Dana Ferrell, T. Howell, Laura Kimble and 11 more
PersonDana Ferrell“Delegate and co-sponsor of HB 4163.”Map →
PersonT. Howell“Primary delegate sponsor of HB 4163.”Map →
PersonLaura Kimble“Delegate and co-sponsor of HB 4163.”Map →
PersonB. Smith“Delegate and co-sponsor of HB 4163.”Map →
PersonKathie Hess Crouse“Delegate and co-sponsor of HB 4163.”Map →
OrganizationWest Virginia Legislature“The legislative body considering the bill.”Map →
PersonEric Brooks“Delegate and co-sponsor of HB 4163.”Map →
PersonMargitta Mazzocchi“Delegate and co-sponsor of HB 4163.”Map →
PersonSarah Drennan“Delegate and co-sponsor of HB 4163.”Map →
PersonMarshall Clay“Delegate and co-sponsor of HB 4163.”Map →
OrganizationHouse Judiciary“Committee to which the bill was referred.”Map →
PersonLisa White“Delegate and co-sponsor of HB 4163.”Map →
OrganizationSecretary of State“Maintains the electronic database of notices of requests and online FOIA databas”Map →
PersonDave Foggin“Delegate and co-sponsor of HB 4163.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record