POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCourts →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Missouri House Bill 2141 Modifies Trial Procedures and Sentencing Rules for First-Degree Murder Cases

Original title: TRIAL PROCEDURES FOR MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE

Last action · May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H)Sponsor: Michael Davis

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 2141 modifies trial procedures and sentencing rules for first-degree murder cases, including provisions for two-stage trials when the death penalty is not waived, standards for assessing life imprisonment without parole versus the death penalty, and rules for pre-trial determination of intellectual disability.

Why it matters

The measure alters how evidence is presented during the penalty phase of capital trials and updates the legal standards under which a jury or judge must impose life imprisonment without parole instead of the death penalty.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

criminal defendants facing first-degree murder charges

Defendants are subject to revised two-stage trial procedures, evidentiary rules during the penalty phase, and pre-trial options regarding intellectual disability determinations.

Directly affected

prosecuting attorneys

Prosecutors must follow updated guidelines for presenting evidence in aggravation and conducting argument during the sentencing phase of first-degree murder trials.

Key Facts

  • Where the death penalty is not waived in a first-degree murder trial, the trial proceeds in two distinct stages before the same trier.
  • The trier assesses and declares punishment at life imprisonment without eligibility for probation, parole, or release except by act of the governor under specific statutory conditions, including if the trier finds the defendant intellectually disabled by a preponderance of the evidence.
  • Evidence in aggravation and mitigation of punishment may be presented at the second stage, including evidence concerning the murder victim and the impact of the offense upon the victim's family.
  • Upon written agreement of the parties and with leave of the court, the issue of the defendant's intellectual disability may be addressed and decided prior to trial.
Show all 6 facts
  • The bill defines 'intellectual disability' or 'intellectually disabled' as a condition involving substantial limitations in general functioning manifested and documented before eighteen years of age.
  • The provisions of the bill govern offenses committed on or after August 28, 2001.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a jury in a first-degree murder trial cannot agree on the punishment?
The court shall assess and declare the punishment at life imprisonment without eligibility for probation, parole, or release except by act of the governor.
Can the issue of a defendant's intellectual disability be determined before trial?
Yes, upon written agreement of the parties and with leave of the court, the issue of intellectual disability may be taken up and decided prior to trial without prejudicing the defendant's right to have the issue submitted to the of fact.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  2. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  3. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  4. Dec 3, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Joseph Engler
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk introducing the bill.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record