The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Michigan requires reentry services and housing for prisoners discharged after overturned convictions or specific resentencing
Last action · June 18, 2026: referred to Committee on JudiciarySponsor: Sylvia Santana
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
The Michigan Department of Corrections must provide reentry services for up to two years, transitional housing for up to one year, and vital identity documents to prisoners discharged before their maximum release date because their conviction was reversed, vacated, or overturned, or following a qualifying resentencing event.
Discharged individuals whose convictions are overturned or who undergo qualifying resentencing receive state-provided reentry support and housing, while those whose convictions are later reinstated must repay the state for those services.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
prisoners discharged after overturned convictions or qualifying resentencing
Eligible individuals receive up to two years of reentry services, up to one year of transitional housing, and vital documents upon discharge.
the department
The department is required to provide specific reentry services, housing, documents, assign oversight staff, and calculate and collect repayments if convictions are reinstated.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is eligible to receive reentry services under this bill?
What happens if a released prisoner's overturned conviction is later reinstated?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
12 actions- Jun 18, 2026HouseCommitteereferred to Committee on Judiciary
- Jun 18, 2026HouseIntroducedread a first time
- Jun 18, 2026Housereceived on 06/18/2026
- Jun 18, 2026SenateFloorPASSED ROLL CALL # 149 YEAS 31 NAYS 5 EXCUSED 2 NOT VOTING 0
- Jun 18, 2026SenatePLACED ON IMMEDIATE PASSAGE
- Jun 18, 2026SenateRULES SUSPENDED
Show 6 earlier actions
- Jun 18, 2026SenatePLACED ON ORDER OF THIRD READING
- Jun 18, 2026SenateREPORTED BY COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT(S)
- Dec 4, 2025SenateCommitteeREFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
- Dec 4, 2025SenateCommitteeREPORTED FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT 12/3/2025
- Sep 25, 2025SenateCommitteeREFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RIGHTS, JUDICIARY, AND PUBLIC SAFETY
- Sep 25, 2025SenateIntroducedINTRODUCED BY SENATOR SYLVIA SANTANA
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
PASSED ROLL CALL # 149 YEAS 31 NAYS 5 EXCUSED 2 NOT VOTING 0
Total
36
- Yes
- 31
- No
- 5
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (36)
12 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
legislature.mi.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy30Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
