POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Michigan requires reentry services and housing for prisoners discharged after overturned convictions or specific resentencing

Original title: Corrections: other; reentry services and support for certain individuals after resentencing; require.

Last action · June 18, 2026: referred to Committee on JudiciarySponsor: Sylvia Santana

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

The Michigan Department of Corrections must provide reentry services for up to two years, transitional housing for up to one year, and vital identity documents to prisoners discharged before their maximum release date because their conviction was reversed, vacated, or overturned, or following a qualifying resentencing event.

Why it matters

Discharged individuals whose convictions are overturned or who undergo qualifying resentencing receive state-provided reentry support and housing, while those whose convictions are later reinstated must repay the state for those services.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

prisoners discharged after overturned convictions or qualifying resentencing

Eligible individuals receive up to two years of reentry services, up to one year of transitional housing, and vital documents upon discharge.

Directly affected

the department

The department is required to provide specific reentry services, housing, documents, assign oversight staff, and calculate and collect repayments if convictions are reinstated.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible to receive reentry services under this bill?
Prisoners discharged from custody before their maximum discharge date without being granted parole because their conviction or sentence was reversed, vacated, or overturned, or those discharged immediately after being resentenced for a .
What happens if a released prisoner's overturned conviction is later reinstated?
A prisoner who received reentry services whose conviction is subsequently reinstated or who is resentenced and returned to the custody of the department must repay the department for all reentry services received.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

12 actions
  1. Jun 18, 2026HouseCommittee
    referred to Committee on Judiciary
  2. Jun 18, 2026HouseIntroduced
    read a first time
  3. Jun 18, 2026House
    received on 06/18/2026
  4. Jun 18, 2026SenateFloor
    PASSED ROLL CALL # 149 YEAS 31 NAYS 5 EXCUSED 2 NOT VOTING 0
  5. Jun 18, 2026Senate
    PLACED ON IMMEDIATE PASSAGE
  6. Jun 18, 2026Senate
    RULES SUSPENDED
Show 6 earlier actions
  1. Jun 18, 2026Senate
    PLACED ON ORDER OF THIRD READING
  2. Jun 18, 2026Senate
    REPORTED BY COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT(S)
  3. Dec 4, 2025SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
  4. Dec 4, 2025SenateCommittee
    REPORTED FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT 12/3/2025
  5. Sep 25, 2025SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RIGHTS, JUDICIARY, AND PUBLIC SAFETY
  6. Sep 25, 2025SenateIntroduced
    INTRODUCED BY SENATOR SYLVIA SANTANA

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Outcome not reportedSenate6/18/2026Michigan LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

PASSED ROLL CALL # 149 YEAS 31 NAYS 5 EXCUSED 2 NOT VOTING 0

Total

36

Yes
31
No
5
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0

How they voted (36)

12 more members

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Montgomery v Louisiana, Miller v Alabama, Sylvia Santana and 2 more
otherMontgomery v Louisiana“Qualifying event legal citation”Map →
otherMiller v Alabama“Qualifying event legal citation”Map →
PersonSylvia Santana“Bill sponsor”Map →
otherPeople v Stovall“Qualifying event legal citation”Map →
otherPeople v Parks“Qualifying event legal citation”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record