POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Iowa Senate File 203 Prohibits Taking Black Bears, Gray Wolves, and Mountain Lions

Original title: A bill for an act relating to the taking of black bears, gray wolves, and mountain lions, and providing penalties.

Last action · February 5, 2025: Subcommittee: Evans, De Witt, and Trone Garriott. S.J. 203 .Sponsor: Molly Donahue

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill prohibits the of black bears, gray wolves, and mountain lions in Iowa, establishes strict exceptions for self-defense and livestock protection, and imposes criminal and civil penalties for violations.

Why it matters

Residents, livestock owners, and hunters face potential charges, fines between $855 and $8,540, and civil penalties of up to $2,000 for unlawfully killing protected apex predators.

Background
  • State File 203 was introduced in the Iowa Senate by Senator Donahue during the 2025 legislative session. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Livestock Owners

Livestock owners must follow strict reporting conditions, avoid dogs and traps, and seek prior authorization if they need to protect livestock from protected predators.

Directly affected

State Fish and Game Protection Fund

The fund receives additional revenue from civil penalties levied against individuals who violate the predator protection rules.

Key Facts

  • A person is prohibited from taking a black bear, gray wolf, or mountain lion unless otherwise provided by law.
  • Wolves are officially removed from the Code definition of 'fur-bearing animals'.
  • Taking an animal is permitted if immediately necessary to protect a person or companion animal from bodily harm, provided the department is notified within twenty-four hours.
  • Livestock owners may take an animal to protect livestock only if they submit a detailed written report to the department within five days and refrain from using dogs, traps, or snares.
Show all 7 facts
  • Violating the taking prohibition is classified as an aggravated misdemeanor, punishable by confinement of up to two years and fines ranging from $855 to $8,540.
  • Violators are subject to a civil penalty of up to $2,000 per violation, which is deposited into the state fish and game protection fund.
  • Unlawfully taking a black bear, gray wolf, mountain lion, elk, antelope, buffalo, or moose requires reimbursing the state $2,500 for the value of the animal.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I kill a wolf or bear if it attacks my livestock?
Yes, but only if the take is immediately necessary to protect livestock, dogs, traps, and snares are not used, and you submit a detailed written report to the department within five days.
What are the penalties for unlawfully killing a mountain lion?
Unlawfully a mountain lion is an carrying potential confinement of up to two years, fines between $855 and $8,540, a civil penalty up to $2,000, and a $2,500 state reimbursement fee.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 5, 2025Senate
    Subcommittee: Evans, De Witt, and Trone Garriott. S.J. 203 .
  2. Feb 4, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced, referred to Natural Resources and Environment. S.J. 188 .

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Reclassification of Wolves

The bill shifts wolves out of the statutory definition of fur-bearing animals to establish an explicit taking prohibition.

Connected Entities

State Fish and Game Protection Fund, Molly Donahue
OrganizationState Fish and Game Protection Fund“Fund receiving civil penalties and interest”Map →
PersonMolly Donahue“Bill sponsor in the Iowa Senate”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.iowa.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record