POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri bill requires public schools and universities to treat antisemitic discrimination like racial discrimination

Original title: Creates provisions relating to protections against discrimination in educational settings

Last action · March 10, 2026: Voted Do Pass S Education CommitteeSponsor: Curtis Trent

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill requires all public K-12 schools, school districts, and public postsecondary institutions in Missouri to treat discrimination and harassment motivated by antisemitism in an identical manner to racial discrimination. Institutions must integrate the into their codes of conduct, establish reporting processes, and prohibit behaviors that create fear or intimidation. The measure also explicitly protects free speech by stating that standard criticism of Israel is not antisemitic and that First Amendment rights remain fully protected.

Why it matters

Public schools and universities across Missouri must update their codes of conduct and reporting mechanisms within strict compliance timelines or face state escalation to federal authorities.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Public school students and employees

Students and staff are afforded identical protections against antisemitic discrimination as racial discrimination, and their institutions must update codes of conduct accordingly.

Directly affected

Postsecondary students, faculty, and staff

Public university and college attendees and employees are covered by mandatory antisemitism prohibitions and formal campus reporting channels.

Directly affected

Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

The department must establish a formal reporting process, investigate K-12 complaints, notify non-compliant schools, refer unresolved cases to federal agencies, and publish an annual report.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the bill define antisemitism?
The bill adopts the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) Working Definition of Antisemitism, including its contemporary examples, as adopted on May 26, 2016.
Does this bill restrict criticism of Israel?
No. The bill explicitly states that criticism of Israel that is similar to criticism directed toward any other country shall not be construed as antisemitic.
What happens if an educational institution fails to address reported antisemitic discrimination?
After a thorough investigation by the relevant and a 30-day window given to the institution to address the issue, continued failure results in the state reporting the violation to the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Justice.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Mar 10, 2026SenateCommittee
    Voted Do Pass S Education Committee
  2. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Hearing Conducted S Education Committee
  3. Jan 15, 2026SenateFloor
    Second Read and Referred S Education Committee
  4. Jan 7, 2026SenateIntroduced
    S First Read
  5. Dec 1, 2025Senate
    Prefiled

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. The text on record is the 5611S.01I - Introduced version. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Standardization of Antisemitism Oversight

The bill bridges K-12 and postsecondary systems under parallel compliance paths involving distinct state agencies while utilizing the same underlying federal Title VI framework.

Connected Entities

United States Department of Justice, Curtis Trent, General Assembly and 4 more
OrganizationUnited States Department of Justice“Federal agency notified in cases of unresolved institutional non-compliance”Map →
PersonCurtis Trent“Senator, District 20”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body of the State of Missouri”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Higher Education and Workforce Development“State department housing the coordinating board for higher education”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Elementary and Secondary Education“State agency receiving K-12 antisemitism complaints and publishing annual report”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of Education“Federal agency notified in cases of unresolved institutional non-compliance”Map →
OrganizationCoordinating Board for Higher Education“Board overseeing postsecondary education compliance and reporting”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.senate.mo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz65
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record