POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Proposed Constitutional Amendment Removes Criminal Immunity for Official Acts and Bans Presidential Self-Pardons

Original title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that there is no immunity from criminal prosecution for an act on the grounds that such act was within the constitutional authority or official duties of an individual, and providing that the President may not grant a pardon to himself or herself.

Last action · July 22, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This proposed would establish that individuals cannot claim based on their official duties or constitutional authority. Additionally, it would explicitly prohibit the President of the United States from granting a to themselves.

Why it matters

The amendment would fundamentally alter the legal protections afforded to federal officials, including the President, by narrowing the scope of executive immunity and restricting the scope of the presidential power.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

President of the United States

The President would be subject to new constitutional restrictions regarding the ability to self-pardon and the scope of immunity for official acts.

Directly affected

Federal officials

Federal officials would no longer be able to claim immunity from criminal prosecution based on the argument that their actions were within their official duties.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this amendment immediately change the law?
No. As a proposed , it must first be passed by a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate, and then be ratified by three-fourths of the states.
What does this amendment say about presidential pardons?
It would add a specific provision to the Constitution stating that the President may not grant a to themselves.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Jul 22, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Constitutional Limitation of Executive Power

The resolution represents a direct legislative attempt to codify limits on executive immunity and pardon powers that are currently defined by judicial precedent.

Connected Entities

House Committee on the Judiciary, President of the United States
OrganizationHouse Committee on the Judiciary“The committee to which the resolution was referred for review.”Map →
PersonPresident of the United States“The office subject to the proposed restrictions on self-pardons and official imm”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance95
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz85
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record