POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri House Bill 2590 establishes breeding, recordkeeping, and warranty rules for commercial pet breeders and dealers

Original title: DOMESTIC PET CARE

Last action · May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H)Sponsors: Doug Clemens and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

The Healthy Pets Act requires commercial breeders to maintain health, genetic, vaccination, and photographic records for breeding animals and restricts pet shops from buying from breeders with recent animal care violations. Dealers and pet shops must transfer complete medical and parentage records to buyers, display breeder and pricing information on animal enclosures, and provide a one-year health warranty for sold animals.

Why it matters

Commercial breeders, dealers, and pet shops must comply with new veterinary, recordkeeping, and warranty mandates or face criminal penalties, license revocation, and financial liability for animal medical costs.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Commercial breeders

Must conduct genetic testing, veterinary examinations, X-ray screenings, maintain extensive housing and parentage records, and meet health standards for breeding animals.

Directly affected

Dealers and pet shops

Face restrictions on sourcing animals from violators, must transfer complete medical and parentage documentation to buyers, display pricing and breeder details, and honor a one-year health warranty.

Directly affected

Consumers

Receive mandatory health disclosures, pricing transparency, and a one-year warranty covering genetic or major medical conditions.

Key Facts

  • Commercial breeders must perform genetic testing, vaccinations, hip dysplasia X-rays, annual veterinarian examinations for males, and pre-breeding exams for females.
  • Breeders must take quarterly photographs of housing enclosures and exercise areas for all breeding animals.
  • Breeders must complete genetic testing, vaccinations, hip dysplasia screenings, and socialization reviews before selling any animal.
  • Dealers and pet shops are prohibited from purchasing animals from commercial breeders with state or federal animal care violations within the past three years or animal abuse convictions.
Show all 8 facts
  • The attorney general holds concurrent jurisdiction to enforce dealer and pet shop purchase restrictions, with knowing violations constituting a class A misdemeanor or class E felony.
  • Dealers and pet shops repeating violations three or more times face immediate license revocation and a permanent ban from selling animals.
  • Pet shops must prominently display total purchase prices, taxes, fees, licensing costs, and breeder information on each animal's enclosure.
  • Consumers receive a one-year warranty from the date of purchase ensuring animals are free from genetic or major medical conditions not caused by physical injury, holding dealers or pet shops liable for medical costs, euthanasia, or refunds.

Frequently Asked Questions

What health records must commercial breeders keep for breeding animals?
Commercial breeders must keep records of genetic testing, recommended department of agriculture vaccinations, X-ray screenings, annual veterinary exams for males with recent photographs, pre-breeding exams for females with photographs and cycle counts, and quarterly photographs of housing and exercise enclosures.
Can pet shops buy animals from any breeder?
No. Pet shops and dealers cannot buy animals from commercial breeders who have been found in violation of state or federal animal care laws within the last three years or convicted of animal abuse or neglect.
What does the one-year consumer warranty cover?
Animals purchased from a dealer or pet shop are warrantied to be free from genetic or major medical conditions not caused by physical injury for one year. If a condition manifests, the seller is liable for reasonable medical costs, humane euthanasia costs, or a return and full refund at the consumer's discretion.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  2. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  3. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  4. Dec 29, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Introduction of Mandatory Pet Industry Warranties and Breeder Sourcing Restrictions

HB 2509 creates strict legal liability for pet shops and dealers regarding pre-existing genetic or major medical conditions and ties retail inventory directly to breeder compliance histories.

Connected Entities

Doug Clemens, Joseph Engler, General Assembly and 1 more
PersonDoug Clemens“Representative introducing HB 2590”Map →
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“103rd General Assembly of the state of Missouri”Map →
PersonTonya Rush“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record