POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Alabama bill establishes statutory rights for contraception and in vitro fertilization and authorizes civil lawsuits against restrictive policies

Original title: Human fertility; to recognize the right of Alabamians to engage in contraception and assisted reproductive practices such as in vitro fertilization

Last action · March 19, 2026: Pending Committee Action in House of OriginSponsor: Marilyn Lands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill establishes that Alabama residents have the legal right to obtain and use contraceptives and s, including in vitro fertilization. It prohibits state and local governments from enforcing laws or policies that restrict these services and allows the Attorney General, health care providers, and individuals to file civil lawsuits for .

Why it matters

Residents gain explicit legal protections to access birth control and fertility treatments, while health care providers receive authorization to challenge restrictive state regulations in court starting October 1, 2026.

Background
  • Assisted reproductive technologies, particularly in vitro fertilization, have been a subject of significant legal and legislative focus in Alabama following state court rulings regarding frozen embryos. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Alabama residents

Individuals gain the legal right to obtain contraceptives and use assisted reproductive treatments without state interference.

Directly affected

Health care providers

Providers, hospitals, clinics, and pharmacists gain the right to dispense contraceptives, provide assisted reproductive treatments, and bring civil suits on behalf of themselves or patients.

Directly affected

State and local government agencies

Agencies and political subdivisions are prohibited from implementing, administering, or enforcing laws, rules, or policies that restrict approved contraceptives or assisted reproductive treatments.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What specific assisted reproductive treatments are included under this bill?
The bill includes treatments involving the handling of eggs or embryos with the intent of establishing pregnancy, such as in vitro fertilization, , pronuclear stage tubal transfer, tubal embryo transfer, and zygote intrafallopian transfer, as well as fertility treatments like ovulation induction and uterine transplantation.
Who is allowed to file a lawsuit under this legislation?
The Attorney General, any adversely affected individual, and health care providers (acting on their own behalf or on behalf of patients, clients, or patrons) may commence a civil action in circuit court for .
What defenses can be raised by someone defending a restrictive rule or policy?
A party may assert that the law significantly advances safety or health in a way that cannot be achieved by a less restrictive alternative, or that the law is also being applied to other medically similar drugs or treatments. These must be established by clear and convincing evidence.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Mar 19, 2026HouseCommittee
    Pending Committee Action in House of Origin
  2. Mar 19, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read for the first time and referred to the House Committee on Health

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Establishment of Statutory Reproductive Rights

The bill shifts Alabama policy by creating explicit statutory rights for contraception and assisted reproductive technologies where none previously existed in state law.

Connected Entities

Attorney General, Rafferty, American Society of Reproductive Medicine and 4 more
OrganizationAttorney General“Authorized to commence civil actions for injunctive relief”Map →
PersonRafferty“Representative co-sponsoring HB 642”Map →
OrganizationAmerican Society of Reproductive Medicine“Source defining assisted reproductive treatment”Map →
locationAlabama“State where the legislation applies”Map →
PersonDaniels“Representative co-sponsoring HB 642”Map →
OrganizationU.S. Food and Drug Administration“Approves contraceptives and drugs for assisted reproductive treatment”Map →
PersonMarilyn Lands“Representative sponsoring HB 642”Map →

Sources

Open source document

alison.legislature.state.al.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record