POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri SB 877 requires legislative and gubernatorial approval for administrative rules with fiscal impacts over $250,000

Original title: Requires General Assembly and gubernatorial approval of proposed administrative rules with a fiscal note over $250,000

Last action · January 14, 2026: Bill Combined w/SCS SBs 891 & 877Sponsors: Travis Fitzwater and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

State agencies in Missouri proposing s with a fiscal impact exceeding $250,000 must notify the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules, obtain written approval from the Governor, and secure approval from the General Assembly via a before the rule can take effect.

Why it matters

Local governments, state entities, individuals, and businesses face new approval hurdles and compliance timelines for any proposed state administrative regulations carrying a financial impact or income reduction greater than $250,000.

Background
  • The Missouri General Assembly is the state's bicameral legislature, consisting of the Senate and the House of Representatives. context
  • Chapter 536 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri (RSMo) governs administrative procedure and rulemaking for state agencies. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State agencies

State agencies must notify the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules, obtain written gubernatorial approval, and secure a concurrent resolution from the General Assembly for rules exceeding the $250,000 fiscal threshold.

Directly affected

Businesses and individuals

Rules impacting business or individual income or expenditures by more than $250,000 are subject to legislative approval and cannot take effect without specific procedural clearances.

Directly affected

Political subdivisions

Local governments and political subdivisions facing public fund expenditures over $250,000 under a proposed state rule are subject to the new legislative review requirements.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What threshold triggers the new legislative and gubernatorial approval requirements?
The requirements apply when a proposed requires or results in public expenditures, or expenditures/reductions in income for individuals or businesses, exceeding $250,000 per year.
Are all administrative rules subject to this bill?
No. Emergency rules, rules required to conform with federal law, and rules required for federal funding are exempt from these provisions.
What role does the Governor play under SB 877?
A state agency cannot file any notice of proposed rulemaking with the Secretary of State without first receiving and including a copy of the written approval of the Governor.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Check Your Understanding

1.According to bill version 5091S.02I, under what condition does a proposed rule subject to section 536.180 become effective?

2.According to Senate Bill 877, what does the text require a state agency to do when proposing a rule that exceeds the $250,000 fiscal impact threshold?

Auto-generated · not yet reviewed

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Jan 14, 2026Senate
    Bill Combined w/SCS SBs 891 & 877
  2. Jan 12, 2026Senate
    Hearing Conducted S Government Efficiency Committee
  3. Jan 8, 2026SenateFloor
    Second Read and Referred S Government Efficiency Committee
  4. Jan 7, 2026SenateIntroduced
    S First Read
  5. Dec 1, 2025Senate
    Prefiled

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. The text on record is the 5091S.02I - Introduced version. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Travis Fitzwater, Curtis Trent, General Assembly and 2 more
PersonTravis Fitzwater“Senator who introduced SB 877”Map →
PersonCurtis Trent“Cosponsor of the bill representing District 20”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“State legislature required to pass a concurrent resolution approving rules”Map →
OrganizationSecretary of State“State office responsible for filing and publishing orders of rulemaking”Map →
OrganizationJoint Committee on Administrative Rules“Legislative committee receiving notification of proposed administrative rules ex”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.senate.mo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record