POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Vermont S.195 transfers legal representation for involuntary commitment proceedings to the Defender General and allows court revocation of nonhospitalization orders

Original title: An act relating to judicial proceedings for involuntary treatment

Last action · January 6, 2026: Read 1st time & referred to Committee on JudiciarySponsor: Nader Hashim

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Vermont S.195 requires the Office of Defender General to represent certain criminally involved individuals in commitment proceedings instead of Vermont Legal Aid, and allows courts to revoke or modify nonhospitalization treatment orders starting July 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Criminally involved individuals facing commitment proceedings will receive court-appointed counsel from a different state office, and patients under nonhospitalization orders face potential court revocation and hospitalization if alternative treatment proves inadequate.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

criminally involved individuals

Their appointed legal representation in commitment proceedings is shifted to the Office of the Defender General.

Directly affected

Office of Defender General

The office is tasked with representing individuals in commitment proceedings instead of Vermont Legal Aid.

Directly affected

Department of Mental Health

The department gains explicit entitlement to appear and call witnesses at commitment proceedings.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who will provide legal representation for individuals in commitment proceedings under this bill?
The Office of the Defender General will provide appointed counsel, replacing Vermont Legal Aid.
What actions can a court take if a patient fails to comply with a nonhospitalization order?
After a proper hearing, the court can modify its original order, direct another alternative treatment program, or enter a new order directing hospitalization for the remainder of the 90-day period.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 6, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Department of Disabilities, Aging, and Independent Living, Office of Defender General, Department of Mental Health and 1 more
OrganizationDepartment of Disabilities, Aging, and Independent Living“Entitled to appear and call witnesses at commitment proceedings where applicable”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Defender General“Assigned to represent criminally involved individuals in commitment proceedings”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Mental Health“Entitled to appear and call witnesses at commitment proceedings”Map →
OrganizationVermont Legal Aid“Previously responsible for providing appointed counsel in certain commitment pro”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.vermont.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance50
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record