POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Surprise Medical Billing

Original title: EXAMINING SURPRISE BILLING: PROTECTING PATIENTS FROM FINANCIAL PAIN

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses the financial burden on patients who receive unexpected, high-cost medical bills for services provided by doctors at facilities they believed were covered by their insurance.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Patients

Patients are the primary group facing unexpected financial liability for medical services provided by out-of-network clinicians.

Health Insurance Providers

Insurers are involved in the negotiation and payment processes for out-of-network claims.

Medical Providers

Physicians and hospitals are involved in billing practices and network participation agreements.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2019 House subcommittee hearing focused on the issue of 'surprise billing,' where patients receive unexpected medical bills after receiving care from providers at facilities. The hearing gathered testimony from health policy experts and industry representatives to explore potential legislative solutions to protect patients from these costs.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses the financial burden on patients who receive unexpected, high-cost medical bills for services provided by doctors at facilities they believed were covered by their insurance.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on April 2, 2019, by the Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions.
  • The primary subject was 'surprise billing,' which occurs when patients are treated by out-of-network providers at in-network facilities.
  • Four expert witnesses provided testimony regarding the causes and potential policy remedies for surprise billing.
  • Numerous medical and industry organizations, including the American Medical Association and the American Hospital Association, submitted written statements for the record.
  • The hearing serves as a foundational record for legislative discussions regarding patient financial protections in the 116th Congress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is surprise billing?
It is a situation where a patient receives care at an facility but is treated by an provider, resulting in unexpected and often high medical bills.
What was the purpose of this hearing?
To examine the issue of surprise billing and gather expert testimony to inform potential federal legislation to protect patients from these unexpected costs.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Bipartisan focus on surprise billing

The hearing demonstrates a high level of engagement from both sides of the aisle on the specific issue of surprise billing in 2019.

Connected Entities

personIlyse SchumanSenior Vice President at American Benefits CouncilMap →
personTim WalbergRanking Member of the Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and PensionsMap →
personFrederick IsasiExecutive Director of Families USAMap →
personChristen Linke YoungFellow at USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative on Health PolicyMap →
organizationAmerican Medical AssociationSubmitted testimony for the recordMap →
personJack HoadleyResearch Professor Emeritus at Georgetown UniversityMap →
personFrederica S. WilsonChairwoman of the Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and PensionsMap →
organizationAmerican Hospital AssociationSubmitted testimony for the recordMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record