POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Progress Report on Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS)

Original title: THE CHEMICAL FACILITIES ANTI-TERRORISM STANDARDS PROGRAM (CFATS)--A PROGRESS REPORT

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The program establishes federal security requirements for high-risk chemical facilities, directly impacting how these businesses operate and how surrounding communities are protected from potential security breaches.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Chemical facility operators

These entities must comply with federal security standards and reporting requirements mandated by the CFATS program.

Local communities near chemical plants

These residents are the primary focus of security measures intended to prevent incidents at nearby chemical facilities.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2018 House Subcommittee hearing regarding the status and effectiveness of the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards () program. The hearing featured testimony from government officials, industry representatives, and environmental advocates regarding how the program secures chemical facilities against potential terrorist threats.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 14, 2018, by the House Subcommittee on Environment.
  • The primary subject was the progress and oversight of the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) program.
  • The hearing included testimony from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regarding program implementation.
  • The Government Accountability Office (GAO) provided an audit perspective on the program's effectiveness.
  • Industry representatives, including Brown Chemical Company and the Society of Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates, provided testimony on compliance impacts.
  • Environmental and advocacy groups, including the Bluegreen Alliance and Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services, provided testimony on community safety concerns.
  • The document includes prepared statements and answers to submitted questions from all seven witnesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CFATS program?
is a federal program managed by the Department of Homeland Security that identifies and regulates high-risk chemical facilities to ensure they have security measures in place to reduce the risk of terrorist attacks.
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included officials from the Department of Homeland Security and the GAO, as well as representatives from the chemical industry, legal experts, and environmental justice advocates.

Why It Matters

The program establishes federal security requirements for high-risk chemical facilities, directly impacting how these businesses operate and how surrounding communities are protected from potential security breaches.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift80% confidence

Multi-stakeholder Oversight

The hearing demonstrates a deliberate effort to balance industry compliance costs with community safety advocacy in the oversight of chemical security.

Connected Entities

personDave WulfActing Deputy Assistant Secretary, Infrastructure Protection, DHSMap →
organizationU.S. Government Accountability OfficeProvided oversight and audit findings on the programMap →
personJohn ShimkusChairman of the Subcommittee on EnvironmentMap →
organizationU.S. Department of Homeland SecurityPrimary agency responsible for the CFATS programMap →
personChris P. CurrieDirector, GAO Homeland Security and Justice TeamMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record