POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on Electric Grid Innovation

Original title: ``THE STATE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION RELATED TO THE ELECTRIC GRID''

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a foundational record for federal policy discussions regarding the modernization of the U.S. electric grid, which impacts the reliability and cost of electricity for all residents.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Electric utility companies

These entities are responsible for implementing grid technologies and managing transmission infrastructure.

Energy consumers

The reliability and cost of electricity services are influenced by grid modernization policies discussed in this hearing.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources held a hearing on March 17, 2015, to evaluate the current state of technological innovation within the American electric grid. Experts from national laboratories, research institutes, and utility companies provided testimony on the modernization and reliability of the nation's power infrastructure.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on March 17, 2015, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  • The session focused on 'Grid 2.0' and technological innovations for the electric grid.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the Electric Power Research Institute, Argonne National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, American Electric Power, and the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.
  • The committee received written testimony and responses to questions for the record from all five witnesses.
  • The hearing record includes a 2011 EPRI technical report on the costs and benefits of the smart grid.
  • The hearing record includes a compilation of success stories from the Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to evaluate the current state of technological innovation related to the American electric grid.
Who testified at the hearing?
Experts from the Electric Power Research Institute, Argonne National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, American Electric Power, and the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners provided testimony.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a foundational record for federal policy discussions regarding the modernization of the U.S. electric grid, which impacts the reliability and cost of electricity for all residents.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference100% confidence

Historical Smart Grid Data

The hearing record incorporates a 2011 EPRI report, demonstrating the committee's reliance on existing industry research to frame policy discussions.

Connected Entities

personMichael HowardPresident and CEO of Electric Power Research InstituteMap →
personJeffrey TaftChief Architect for Electric Grid Transformation at Pacific Northwest National LMap →
personPeter LittlewoodDirector of Argonne National LaboratoryMap →
organizationCommittee on Energy and Natural ResourcesSenate committee conducting the hearingMap →
personLisa EdgarPresident of National Association of Regulatory Utility CommissionersMap →
personMaria CantwellRanking Member of the CommitteeMap →
personLisa MurkowskiChairman of the Committee on Energy and Natural ResourcesMap →
personLisa BartonExecutive Vice President of Transmission at American Electric PowerMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record