POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Ohio House Bill 980 Enacts Rideshare Safety Rules and Annual Background Checks

Original title: Enact the Rideshare Sexual Assault Prevention Act

Last action · July 22, 2026: IntroducedSponsors: Michele Grim and 6 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Ohio House Bill 980 requires transportation network companies to conduct annual background checks on drivers, establishes mandatory safety policies, and prohibits altering user ratings or collecting without consent. The measure also mandates annual reporting of safety, discrimination, and accident incidents to the Public Utilities Commission starting January 1st.

Why it matters

Rideshare companies must pay a $5,000 annual permit fee, comply with strict driver disqualification rules, and face a $1,500 fine per violation for non-compliance, while riders gain the option to use audio and video recording during trips.

Background
  • Transportation network companies in Ohio are regulated under Chapter 4925 of the Revised Code by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

transportation network company drivers

Drivers must undergo mandatory annual background checks, face disqualification based on specific criminal or driving history criteria, and are subject to safety and training policy updates.

Directly affected

transportation network company riders

Riders gain the option to use audio and video recordings during prearranged rides, protection against unauthorized biometric data collection, and restrictions on transporting unaccompanied juveniles.

Directly affected

transportation network companies

Companies must pay an annual permit fee, enforce driver background screening, compile and submit annual incident reports to the Public Utilities Commission, and face statutory fines for non-compliance.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What background checks are required for rideshare drivers under this bill?
Transportation network companies must conduct annual background checks that include a multi-state or nationwide criminal records database search, primary source verification, a search of the U.S. Department of Justice national sex offender public website, and a review of the driver's driving history report.
Can rideshare companies charge extra if a passenger uses audio and video recording?
No. The bill explicitly prohibits transportation network companies from charging a fee or increasing the cost of a prearranged ride solely because a rider chooses to use audio and video recordings.
What happens if a transportation network company fails to comply with reporting or background check rules?
The Public Utilities Commission is required to fine the company one thousand five hundred dollars for each instance of non-compliance with specified background check, reporting, or safety provisions.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jul 22, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Public Utilities Commission, Rachel Baker, Anita Somani and 5 more
OrganizationPublic Utilities Commission“State commission responsible for issuing permits, adopting rules, and receiving ”Map →
PersonRachel Baker“State Representative (Democrat, District 27)”Map →
PersonAnita Somani“Cosponsor, State Representative (Democrat, District 8)”Map →
PersonEric Synenberg“Cosponsor, State Representative (Democrat, District 21)”Map →
PersonMichele Grim“State Representative (Democrat, District 43)”Map →
PersonKaren Brownlee“Cosponsor, State Representative (Democrat, District 28)”Map →
PersonSean Brennan“Cosponsor, State Representative (Democrat, District 14)”Map →
PersonCrystal Lett“Cosponsor, State Representative (Democrat, District 11)”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legislature.ohio.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record