POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah extends radioactive waste facility expansion tax and alters repeal dates

Original title: Radioactive Waste Facility Tax Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsors: Carl Albrecht and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Utah HB 201 extends the radioactive waste facility expansion tax application deadline to December 31, 2026, and updates related repeal dates. The tax remains $3.45 per cubic yard for up to 8,700,000 cubic yards of .

Why it matters

Operators submitting s must continue paying the $3.45 per cubic yard expansion tax through the extended December 31, 2026 deadline, with revenues directed into the Electrical Energy Development Investment Fund.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Radioactive waste facility operators

Operators submitting expansion applications are subject to the extended $3.45 per cubic yard tax through December 31, 2026.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline to apply for a radioactive waste facility expansion under the extended tax?
Facility operators must submit a new to the division on or before December 31, 2026.
Where does the revenue collected from the expansion tax go?
The commission deposits the tax revenue collected into the Electrical Energy Development Investment Fund.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

11 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Jan 20, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  4. Jan 20, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  5. Jan 20, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0201
  6. Jan 16, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0201
Show 5 earlier actions
  1. Jan 14, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  2. Jan 8, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0201
  3. Jan 8, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0201
  4. Jan 8, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  5. Jan 8, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Electrical Energy Development Investment Fund, Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control, Youth Electronic Cigarette, Marijuana, and Other Drug Prevention Committee
OrganizationElectrical Energy Development Investment Fund“Fund where the commission deposits tax revenue collected under Section 59-24-103”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Waste Management and Radiation Control“Division created in Section 19-1-105 that reviews radioactive waste facility app”Map →
OrganizationYouth Electronic Cigarette, Marijuana, and Other Drug Prevention Committee“Committee referenced in repeal date provisions.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record