
NewsLos Angeles TimesOctober 24, 2026Los Angeles County
Sheriff Chad Bianco asks Riverside County to pay legal bills exceeding $10,000 over ballot seizure
Photo: Los Angeles Times
Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco's representative filed a damages claim exceeding $10,000 requiring the county to cover his legal costs in four civil proceedings arising from his ballot seizure, threatening a lawsuit if rejected. Attorney Bradley Hertz stated the claim was filed last week, while county spokesperson Brooke Federico confirmed receipt on Oct. 16 and stated the county is determining next steps.
Read the full story at Los Angeles TimesWhy It Matters
Riverside County taxpayers face potential litigation expenses if officials reject Sheriff Bianco's claim for privately retained legal defense costs resulting from his controversial ballot seizure.
Key Facts
Each fact below is taken from the article. Click one to see the exact passage.
Who's Mentioned
PersonBrooke Federico“Stated the county received the claim on Oct. 16 and is determining next steps.”OrganizationCalifornia Supreme Court“Ruled the ballot seizure unlawful last month.”PersonChad Bianco“Filed a claim for damages exceeding $10,000 to cover legal costs in four civil p”OrganizationRiverside County Board of Supervisors“Voted 4-1 against funding Bianco's legal defense in April.”PersonRob Bonta“Quickly rebuked Bianco's unprecedented action of seizing ballots.”locationRiverside County“Received the claim for damages and previously voted against funding Bianco's leg”OrganizationThe Riverside Record“Outlet where Supervisor Jose Medina made statements.”PersonJose Medina“Commented on the board's criteria for funding legal defenses.”OrganizationThe Times“Received email correspondence from attorney Bradley Hertz.”PersonBradley Hertz“Wrote an email to The Times regarding the claim and potential lawsuit.”
