POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Montana regulates aquaculture sales, exempts products from standard commodity measures, and defines commercial aquatic farming

Original title: Provide for regulation and sale of aquaculture

Last action · May 5, 2025: Chapter Number AssignedSponsor: Greg Hertz

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Montana Senate Bill 161 establishes regulatory standards and definitions for products, exempts them from general commodity weight and measure rules, and allows direct sales under homemade food exemptions. The law takes effect immediately upon passage and approval in 2025.

Why it matters

producers gain explicit legal definitions and exemptions from standard retail food facility permitting for direct-to-consumer sales, while raw aquaculture items are formally integrated into state agricultural and food safety statutes.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Aquaculture producers

Aquaculture producers operate under newly codified statutory definitions, specific commodity measure exemptions, and direct-sale guidelines.

Directly affected

Retail food establishments

Retail food establishments handle raw agricultural commodities including aquaculture products under updated definitions and exemptions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is aquaculture under SB 161?
is defined as the commercial production of aquatic organisms under throughout part or all of their life cycle.
Are aquaculture products subject to standard commodity weight and measure rules?
No. Section 30-12-301, MCA, is amended to exempt products from the requirement that commodities be sold strictly by weight, measure of length, area, or count.
Do natural lakes and rivers qualify as controlled conditions for aquaculture?
No. The law explicitly states that do not include a pond, lake, reservoir, river, ocean, or stream.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

45 actions
  1. May 5, 2025Senate
    Chapter Number Assigned
  2. May 1, 2025SenateEnrolled
    (S) Signed by Governor
  3. Apr 22, 2025Senate
    (S) Transmitted to Governor
  4. Apr 18, 2025House
    (H) Signed by Speaker
  5. Apr 13, 2025Senate
    (S) Signed by President
  6. Apr 5, 2025Senate
    (S) Returned from Enrolling
Show 39 earlier actions
  1. Apr 4, 2025Senate
    (S) Sent to Enrolling
  2. Apr 4, 2025Senate
    (S) 3rd Reading House Amendments
  3. Apr 4, 2025Senate
    (S) Scheduled for 3rd Reading
  4. Apr 3, 2025Senate
    (S) 2nd Reading House Amendments
  5. Apr 3, 2025Senate
    (S) Scheduled for 2nd Reading
  6. Apr 1, 2025House
    (H) Returned to Senate with Amendments
  7. Apr 1, 2025House
    (H) 3rd Reading
  8. Apr 1, 2025House
    (H) Scheduled for 3rd Reading
  9. Mar 28, 2025House
    (H) 2nd Reading
  10. Mar 28, 2025House
    (H) 2nd Reading Motion to Amend
  11. Mar 28, 2025House
    (H) Scheduled for 2nd Reading
  12. Mar 21, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Committee Report
  13. Mar 20, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Committee Executive Action
  14. Mar 17, 2025House
    (H) Hearing
  15. Feb 25, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Printed
  16. Feb 24, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Unsigned
  17. Feb 24, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Received
  18. Feb 19, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Requested
  19. Feb 19, 2025House
    (H) 1st Reading
  20. Feb 19, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Referred to Committee
  21. Feb 18, 2025Senate
    (S) Transmitted to House
  22. Feb 18, 2025Senate
    (S) 3rd Reading
  23. Feb 18, 2025Senate
    (S) Scheduled for 3rd Reading
  24. Feb 15, 2025Senate
    (S) 2nd Reading
  25. Feb 15, 2025Senate
    (S) Scheduled for 2nd Reading
  26. Jan 31, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Committee Report
  27. Jan 31, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Committee Executive Action
  28. Jan 24, 2025Senate
    (S) Hearing
  29. Jan 17, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Referred to Committee
  30. Jan 16, 2025Senate
    (S) 1st Reading
  31. Jan 15, 2025SenateIntroduced
    (S) Introduced
  32. Jan 15, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Delivered to Requester
  33. Jan 14, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Ready for Delivery
  34. Jan 14, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Assembly
  35. Jan 13, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Final Drafter Review
  36. Jan 13, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Input/Proofing
  37. Jan 8, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Edit
  38. Jan 8, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Legal Review
  39. Nov 11, 2024House
    (LC) Drafter Assigned

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Integration of Aquaculture into Raw Agricultural Standards

SB 161 systematically amends multiple chapters of Montana code to classify aquaculture products alongside traditional raw agricultural commodities and exempt them from standard retail food permitting.

Connected Entities

Department of Public Health and Human Services, Department of Livestock, Greg Hertz
OrganizationDepartment of Public Health and Human Services“Department defined in 2-15-2201”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Livestock“State department receiving records from small dairies”Map →
PersonGreg Hertz“Republican Senator, District 7, who introduced SB 161”Map →

Sources

Open source document

bills.legmt.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record