POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Alabama Restricts Minor Access to Recommendation Algorithms and Sets Notification Hours on Social Media Platforms

Original title: Consumer protection; access by minors to certain platform portions restricted; hours for sending notifications to covered minors limited; default platform settings on certain platforms required; mechanism for more stringent optional settings required; annual disclosure of certain data by covered operators required; violations a deceptive trade practice

Last action · February 24, 2026: Re-referred to Committee in House of OriginSponsor: Ben Robbins

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

The bill restricts online platform operators from using algorithmic recommendations for users under 18 unless age verification or parental consent is obtained, limits notification hours between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Central Standard Time, and mandates default limits on minor usage starting October 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Online platform operators face potential liability under the if they fail to implement age-verification methods, strict default usage limits, and annual public reporting starting by March 1, 2028.

Background
  • State legislatures across the United States have increasingly introduced bills aimed at regulating social media companies and protecting minor users online through age verification and parental controls. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

covered minors

Minors under 18 face restrictions on algorithmic feed access, notification hours, and default daily usage limits.

Directly affected

covered operators

Platform providers must alter default settings, build parental control mechanisms, verify ages, delete verification data, and publish annual statistics.

Directly affected

parents or legal guardians

Guardians gain rights to give verifiable consent, request more stringent platform settings, and specify notification and time limits.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who qualifies as a covered minor under this bill?
Any covered user who is younger than 18 years of age.
What are the restricted hours for sending notifications to minors?
s may only send notifications concerning recommendations between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Central Standard Time, unless parental consent is obtained for other hours.
What happens if a platform violates these provisions?
A violation of this section is deemed a violation of the Alabama .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Feb 24, 2026HouseCommittee
    Re-referred to Committee in House of Origin
  2. Jan 13, 2026HouseCommittee
    Pending Committee Action in House of Origin
  3. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read for the first time and referred to the House Committee on Children and Senior Advocacy

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Expansion of Deceptive Trade Practices Enforcement

The measure ties compliance with minor online safety mandates directly to state consumer protection enforcement under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Connected Entities

Attorney General, Ben Robbins
OrganizationAttorney General“Receives annual disclosures and specifies the form and manner for reports”Map →
PersonBen Robbins“Representative who sponsored HB 173”Map →

Sources

Open source document

alison.legislature.state.al.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record