POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

South Dakota Legislature considers cultivated-protein food products to be adulterated food under state law

Original title: consider a cultivated-protein food product to be adulterated food.

Last action · March 30, 2026: Delivered veto sustained to the Secretary of StateSponsors: Julie Auch and 22 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

South Dakota HB 1077 amends state food safety statutes to legally classify any as . The measure defines cultivated-protein food products as foods derived from manufactured cells grown from agricultural animal stem cells that mimic animal tissue.

Why it matters

The change alters the legal classification of lab-grown meat products in the state's food supply, impacting manufacturers and sellers by categorizing these goods under existing prohibitions.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Food manufacturers

Cultivated-protein food products produced or sold by these entities are legally classified as adulterated food.

Directly affected

Agricultural food animal producers

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the bill change existing South Dakota law?
It adds s to the statutory list of conditions that render food legally adulterated under state law.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Vetoed by the governor.

Procedural history

14 actions
  1. Mar 30, 2026House
    Delivered veto sustained to the Secretary of State
  2. Mar 30, 2026House
    Veto override
  3. Feb 10, 2026House
    Vetoed by the Governor
  4. Feb 10, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Delivered to the Governor
  5. Feb 9, 2026Senate
    Signed by the President
  6. Feb 6, 2026House
    Signed by the Speaker
Show 8 earlier actions
  1. Feb 5, 2026SenateFloor
    Do Pass
  2. Feb 3, 2026SenateCommittee
    Do Pass
  3. Feb 3, 2026Senate
    Scheduled for hearing
  4. Jan 29, 2026SenateIntroduced
    First read in Senate and referred to
  5. Jan 28, 2026HouseFloor
    Do Pass
  6. Jan 27, 2026HouseCommittee
    Do Pass
  7. Jan 27, 2026House
    Scheduled for hearing
  8. Jan 16, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First read in House and referred to

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Motion succeededHouse1/27/2026South Dakota LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Do Pass

Total

13

Yes
9
No
3
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0
Other positions
1

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

South Dakota Legislature
OrganizationSouth Dakota Legislature“Legislative body passing the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

sdlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record