POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofAmericans with Disabilities Act →
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Original title: OVERSIGHT OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990: THE CURRENT STATE OF INTEGRATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES

January 1, 2022

Americans with Disabilities ActCivil RightsDisability IntegrationVoting AccessEmploymentEducation

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal review of how federal law protects the rights of people with disabilities, influencing future legislative priorities regarding accessibility, workplace accommodations, and voting rights.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

People with disabilities

The hearing addresses federal protections and integration efforts that directly impact their access to employment, voting, and education.

Small business owners

The National Federation of Independent Business provided testimony regarding the impact of ADA compliance requirements on small businesses.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties held an hearing on October 20, 2021, to evaluate the current status of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the integration of people with disabilities into society. The hearing featured testimony from advocates, business representatives, and experts regarding employment, voting access, and educational equity.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on October 20, 2021, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The Subcommittee reviewed the current state of integration for people with disabilities under the ADA.
  • Witnesses provided testimony on employment barriers, voting access, and educational disparities.
  • The record includes articles regarding voting restrictions in Texas and their impact on people with disabilities.
  • The record includes data from Child Trends regarding suspension rates for students with disabilities.
  • A letter from the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities was submitted for the official record.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal review of how federal law protects the rights of people with disabilities, influencing future legislative priorities regarding accessibility, workplace accommodations, and voting rights.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The purpose was to conduct of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to assess how well the law is currently supporting the integration of people with disabilities into society.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included Patricia Lee, Regina Kline (SmartJob, LLC), Karen Harned (National Federation of Independent Business), and Michelle Bishop (National Disability Rights Network).

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Voting Access

The inclusion of specific articles regarding Texas voting restrictions suggests a growing legislative focus on the intersection of disability rights and election administration.

National Disability Rights NetworkTexas

Connected Entities

personSteve Cohen“Chair of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties”Map →
personPatricia Lee“Witness from Lumberton, North Carolina”Map →
personMichelle Bishop“Voter Access and Engagement Manager at the National Disability Rights Network”Map →
personKaren Harned“Executive Director of the National Federation of Independent Business”Map →
personMike Johnson“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
personRegina Kline“Founder and CEO of SmartJob, LLC”Map →
otherAmericans with Disabilities Act of 1990“The primary federal law being reviewed for oversight”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record