Hearing on Serbia's Leadership of the OSCE
January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing outlines the U.S. government's expectations for the OSCE's diplomatic response to the conflict in Ukraine and the humanitarian crisis affecting millions of people in the region.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Ukraine
The country is the site of active conflict and humanitarian crisis involving millions of residents.
Russia
The government is a member of the OSCE and is accused by the Commission of violating the Minsk agreements.
Serbia
The nation held the 2015 chairmanship of the OSCE, tasked with leading the organization's response to regional conflicts.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on February 25, 2015, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- Ivica Dacic served as the Chairperson-in-Office of the OSCE for 2015.
- The conflict in Ukraine resulted in over 5,600 deaths and 1.5 million internally displaced persons as of February 2015.
- The Minsk agreements were signed in February 2015 to address the conflict in Ukraine.
- The OSCE operates on a consensus basis, giving member states like Russia an effective veto over many actions.
- The Commission discussed the need for OSCE monitors to have full access to conflict zones.
- The hearing addressed the requirement for Russia and its proxies to withdraw heavy weapons from front lines.
- Additional topics of discussion included human trafficking and anti-Semitism.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the OSCE?
Why was the OSCE's role in Ukraine discussed?
Why It Matters
This hearing outlines the U.S. government's expectations for the OSCE's diplomatic response to the conflict in Ukraine and the humanitarian crisis affecting millions of people in the region.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy80Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools