POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Infrastructure and Economic Development

Original title: BUILDING A 21ST-CENTURY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR AMERICA: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STAKEHOLDERS' PERSPECTIVES

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing served as a formal information-gathering session for the House on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management to inform future federal infrastructure policy and legislative priorities.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Regional Development Organizations

These organizations provide testimony on how federal infrastructure policy impacts regional economic growth and development projects.

Insurance Industry

Representatives from the insurance sector provide input on how infrastructure resilience affects risk management and insurance costs.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is the official record of a 2017 House hearing focused on gathering perspectives from economic development stakeholders regarding national infrastructure needs. The hearing featured testimony from regional development experts, insurance industry representatives, and climate adaptation specialists.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on September 13, 2017, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The hearing was titled 'Building a 21st-Century Infrastructure for America: Economic Development Stakeholders' Perspectives'.
  • The hearing was conducted by the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
  • Five witnesses provided testimony, including representatives from regional councils, economic development organizations, the insurance industry, and climate research centers.
  • A report titled 'Critical Condition: Infrastructure for Economic Development' (2016) was submitted for the record by witness Brett Doney.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to collect expert testimony and stakeholder perspectives on infrastructure needs to help shape future federal economic development and infrastructure policy.
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included representatives from the SEDA-Council of Governments, the Land of Sky Regional Council, the Great Falls Montana Development Authority, the Harford Mutual Insurance Company, and the Georgetown Climate Center.

Why It Matters

The hearing served as a formal information-gathering session for the House on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management to inform future federal infrastructure policy and legislative priorities.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference100% confidence

Infrastructure Report Inclusion

The hearing record explicitly incorporates a 2016 report titled 'Critical Condition: Infrastructure for Economic Development' as a formal submission for the record.

Connected Entities

personSteve LinkousPresident and CEO, Harford Mutual Insurance CompanyMap →
personJustin HembreeExecutive Director, Land of Sky Regional CouncilMap →
personWilliam C. SeigelAssistant Executive Director, SEDA-Council of GovernmentsMap →
organizationSubcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency ManagementThe congressional body that held the hearingMap →
personBrett DoneyPresident and CEO, Great Falls Montana Development AuthorityMap →
personLou BarlettaChairman of the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and EmerMap →
personJessica GrannisAdaption Program Director, Georgetown Climate CenterMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record