The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Nevada Senate Bill 94 Exempts State from Daylight Saving Time and Establishes Year-Round Pacific Standard Time
Last action · April 12, 2025: (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.)Sponsor: Robin Titus
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Nevada exempts itself from federal requirements, mandating that the state and its observe throughout the entire calendar year starting July 1, 2025.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
State of Nevada and political subdivisions
State and local government entities must observe Pacific Standard Time year-round instead of advancing clocks.
Key Facts
- The State of Nevada exempts itself from federal daylight saving time provisions under 15 U.S.C. § 260a(a).
- The state and all political subdivisions must observe Pacific Standard Time based on the solar time of the 120th meridian west of Greenwich for the entire calendar year.
Frequently Asked Questions
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
4 actions- Apr 12, 2025(Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.)
- Feb 3, 2025IntroducedRead first time. To committee.
- Jan 16, 2025From printer.
- Jan 13, 2025IntroducedPrefiled. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To printer.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.leg.state.nv.us
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
- Controversy25Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools