Congressional Hearing on FBI and DOJ 2016 Election Actions
January 1, 2018
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing serves as a formal record of congressional oversight into federal law enforcement conduct during the 2016 election cycle, which impacts public trust and the operational standards of the FBI and DOJ.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Department of Justice
The agency is the subject of oversight regarding its internal actions and investigations.
FBI
The agency is the subject of oversight regarding its internal actions and investigations.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was a joint session between the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- The hearing took place on June 19, 2018, in Room HVC-210 of the Capitol Visitor Center.
- The primary witness was Michael E. Horowitz, the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Justice.
- The hearing was convened to conduct oversight of FBI and DOJ actions taken in advance of the 2016 election.
- Representative Jerrold Nadler introduced a procedural objection to address the separation of immigrant children from their parents at the border before the Inspector General's testimony began.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at this hearing?
Why It Matters
The hearing serves as a formal record of congressional oversight into federal law enforcement conduct during the 2016 election cycle, which impacts public trust and the operational standards of the FBI and DOJ.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Procedural Diversion
The transcript captures a clear attempt by minority leadership to pivot the hearing's focus from FBI oversight to current border immigration policies.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy80Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment60Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools