POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Hearing on Social Security and Payroll Tax Compliance for State and Local Governments

Original title: Complexities and Challenges of Social Security Coverage and Payroll Tax Compliance for State and Local Governments

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses the administrative burden and potential tax compliance errors that affect the Social Security coverage and retirement benefits of millions of state and local government employees.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

State and local government employees

These employees are subject to specific payroll tax compliance rules that determine their Social Security coverage and future retirement benefits.

Social Security Administration

The agency is responsible for managing coverage and addressing the administrative complexities discussed in the hearing.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2017 House Ways and Means subcommittee hearing regarding the administrative complexities of Social Security coverage and for state and local government employees. The hearing focused on the approximately 75% of state and local workers who are covered by Social Security and the challenges in managing their tax obligations.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 29, 2017, by the House Ways and Means Subcommittees on Social Security and Oversight.
  • Approximately 75% of state and local government employees are covered by Social Security.
  • State and local government employees were originally excluded from Social Security coverage due to constitutional concerns.
  • The hearing examined why payroll tax compliance and Social Security coverage for these employees remain complex.
  • The subcommittee discussed the legacy of the Ticket to Work Act of 1999.
  • The record includes written questions for the record directed to the Social Security Administration and the Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division.
  • The Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians provided a public submission for the record.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are all state and local government employees covered by Social Security?
No, the hearing noted that while approximately 75% of state and local workers are covered, a significant portion remains uncovered due to historical constitutional exclusions.
What was the primary focus of this hearing?
The hearing focused on the complexities and challenges of ensuring accurate Social Security coverage and for the state and local government workforce.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses the administrative burden and potential tax compliance errors that affect the Social Security coverage and retirement benefits of millions of state and local government employees.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Historical Exclusion of Public Workers

The hearing highlights that the current complexity in public sector Social Security coverage stems from original constitutional exclusions that were only partially addressed over time.

Connected Entities

organizationRincon Band of Luiseno IndiansSubmitted a statement for the recordMap →
personSunita LoughCommissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities DivisionMap →
personMarianna LaCanforaActing Deputy Commissioner, Office of Retirement and Disability Policy, Social SMap →
personMaryann MotzaLegislative Committee Chair, National Conference of State Social Security AdminiMap →
personSam JohnsonChairman of the Subcommittee on Social SecurityMap →
personJim BunningFormer Social Security Subcommittee ChairmanMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record