House Resolution 177: Setting Rules for Debating Three Regulatory Disapproval Resolutions
March 3, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Current status: passed_chamber.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
This resolution determines the legislative path for three specific attempts to block federal regulations on appliance energy standards, rubber tire manufacturing emissions, and marine archaeological protections, directly impacting the regulatory authority of the Department of Energy, the EPA, and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Department of Energy
The agency's rule on appliance standards is subject to a congressional disapproval resolution.
Environmental Protection Agency
The agency's rule on rubber tire manufacturing emissions is subject to a congressional disapproval resolution.
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
The agency's rule on marine archaeological resources is subject to a congressional disapproval resolution.
Current stage: passed_chamber.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this resolution actually do?
Does this resolution change the federal rules themselves?
How much time is allotted for debate?
Why It Matters
This resolution determines the legislative path for three specific attempts to block federal regulations on appliance energy standards, rubber tire manufacturing emissions, and marine archaeological protections, directly impacting the regulatory authority of the Department of Energy, the EPA, and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Total
420
Yes
211
No
209
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (420)
Herbert Conaway
D · no
Terri Sewell
D · no
Andrew Garbarino
R · yes
Laura Gillen
D · no
John Joyce
R · yes
Melanie Stansbury
D · no
Abraham Hamadeh
R · yes
Cliff Bentz
R · yes
Virginia Foxx
R · yes
Robin Kelly
D · no
Diana Harshbarger
R · yes
Randy Weber
R · yes
Brian Mast
R · yes
Young Kim
R · yes
Brett Guthrie
R · yes
Lateefah Simon
D · no
Chip Roy
R · yes
Jahana Hayes
D · no
James Himes
D · no
Brad Finstad
R · yes
Andy Barr
R · yes
Mary Miller
R · yes
Mike Ezell
R · yes
Ryan Mackenzie
R · yes
+ 396 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Coordinated Regulatory Disapproval
The resolution bundles three separate agency rule disapprovals into a single procedural vehicle, suggesting a coordinated legislative effort to challenge multiple executive branch regulations simultaneously.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy50Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools