Lobbying Disclosure: Family Winemakers of California (Q1 2000)
June 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This report tracks the financial investment of the wine industry in influencing California state legislation and alcohol regulatory fees during the first three months of 2000.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Family Winemakers of California
The organization incurred costs to influence state legislative and regulatory outcomes.
Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP
The firm received payment to provide professional lobbying services.
Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The Family Winemakers of California paid $7,146.68 to Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP for lobbying services.
- The reporting period for these payments is January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2000.
- The lobbying activity focused on nine Assembly Bills: AB 1790, 2703, 2208, 2444, 2170, 2686, 2510, 2663, and 2520.
- The lobbying activity focused on six Senate Bills: SB 1445, 671, 1423, 1511, 2085, and 1233.
- The lobbying activity included advocacy or monitoring regarding Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) fees.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did the Family Winemakers of California spend on lobbying in early 2000?
What specific issues were the lobbyists working on?
Why It Matters
This report tracks the financial investment of the wine industry in influencing California state legislation and alcohol regulatory fees during the first three months of 2000.
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP
on behalf of Family Winemakers of California
Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP
on behalf of Family Winemakers of California
NOSSAMAN GUTHNER KNOX & ELLIOTT LLP
on behalf of FAMILY WINEMAKERS OF CALIFORNIA
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
High volume of legislative monitoring
The client was actively monitoring 15 different pieces of legislation simultaneously, indicating a broad interest in state-level alcohol policy during the 2000 session.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.sos.ca.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance30How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools