POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Pennsylvania Bill Establishes Riparian Buffer Protections and Imposes Fines for Unauthorized Land Development Near Streams

Original title: An Act providing for protection of existing riparian buffers, for restoration of impaired riparian buffers, for exemptions, for municipal authority, for powers and duties of Department of Environmental Protection, for property inspections, for delegation to a municipality, for municipal action appeals, for penalties, civil action and liability for costs and for effect on other Commonwealth laws or regulations and municipal ordinances.

Last action · February 20, 2025: Referred to ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION, Feb. 20, 2025Sponsors: Joe Webster and 10 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Pennsylvania House Bill 673 prohibits most new land development within 100 feet of stream banks to protect water quality, requiring wider buffers for high-value or sloped areas and establishing civil penalties of $1,000 to $2,000 per day for violations. The measure sets mandatory restoration standards for impaired buffers, outlines specific exemptions for utilities, agriculture, and certain single-family homes, and authorizes municipalities and the Department of Environmental Protection to enforce stop-work orders and inspect properties.

Why it matters

Property owners, developers, and local governments across Pennsylvania face new restrictions on land use near water bodies, altering permit requirements for construction and imposing financial liabilities for damaging natural vegetation buffers.

Background
  • Riparian buffers are strips of vegetation along water bodies designed to filter pollutants, stabilize stream banks, and protect aquatic habitats. context
  • The Pennsylvania General Assembly considers environmental protection bills through committee referrals before floor debates and chamber votes. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Property owners

Property owners with land adjacent to water bodies must comply with buffer restrictions, are subject to property inspections, and face civil or criminal penalties and restoration costs for unauthorized disturbances.

Directly affected

Real estate developers

Developers must incorporate minimum buffer widths into land development plans, secure permits conditional on buffer compliance, and implement restoration plans for impaired buffers.

Directly affected

Municipalities

Local governments are authorized to enact conforming ordinances, issue permits, conduct inspections, issue stop-work orders, and process variances and appeals.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the standard minimum width for a protected riparian buffer along a stream?
The minimum width of the protected area is 100 feet on each side of the stream as measured from the top of the bank, unless additional width requirements apply due to water quality designation, slope, wetlands, or impaired status.
Are existing homes and agricultural uses exempt from the buffer restrictions?
Land uses existing as of the effective date of the section are generally exempt unless enlarged, moved, or abandoned for more than one year. Agricultural production consistent with federal and state law and state conservation best management practices is also exempt.
What penalties can be imposed for violating the Riparian Buffer Protection Act?
Penalties include stop-work orders, forfeiture of performance bonds, suspension or revocation of permits, civil penalties ranging from $1,000 to $2,000 per day per violation, criminal penalties of up to 90 days imprisonment or fines of $1,000 to $2,000 per day, and civil liability for 1.5 times the cost of restoring the buffer.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Feb 20, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION, Feb. 20, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Standardization of Riparian Buffer Rules

The bill shifts enforcement and buffer width mandates from purely local discretion to statewide baseline standards administered by municipalities and the Department of Environmental Protection.

Connected Entities

Environmental Hearing Board, Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Forestry and 2 more
OrganizationEnvironmental Hearing Board“Board handling appeals from municipal actions under delegated authority.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Environmental Protection“Commonwealth department responsible for environmental oversight, buffer regulati”Map →
OrganizationBureau of Forestry“Bureau establishing selective logging best management practices.”Map →
OrganizationState Conservation Commission“Agency establishing agricultural best management practices.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Agriculture“Department involved in agricultural standards.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.palegis.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record