Zoning Change Request for 2.36 Acres in Ruskin (PRS 25-0317)

Original title: Application Number: PRS 25-0317 Applicant: JAY TANNER Location: 650ft N of 11th Ave NE & 24th St NE Intersection, & W Side of 24th St NE. Folio Number: 54960.0050 & Portion of 55374.0010 Acreage: 2.36 acres, more or less Comprehensive Plan: SMU-6 Service Area: Urban Community Plan: Ruskin Existing Zoning: PD (19-0067) Request: Minor Modification to PD Modify site plan to remove parcel from PD RECOMMENDATION: Approvable, Subject to Conditions

Record date · September 9, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The Board of County Commissioners has approved a request from Jay Tanner to remove a 2.36-acre parcel from an existing zoning designation. This to the site plan allows the property to be separated from the previous development agreement.

Why it matters

This decision changes the regulatory status of 2.36 acres of land in the Ruskin area, removing it from a specific Planned Development (PD 19-0067) site plan and potentially altering future development requirements for the owner.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Jay Tanner

The applicant is granted the requested modification to their property's zoning status.

Indirectly affected

Ruskin residents

The land use designation and development potential of the 2.36-acre site in their community has been altered.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does it mean to remove a parcel from a Planned Development (PD)?

It means the specific 2.36-acre property is no longer bound by the site plan and development rules established under the previous PD 19-0067 agreement.

Does this approval mean construction can start immediately?

The document states the request is 'Approvable, Subject to Conditions,' meaning the applicant must meet specific requirements set by the county before proceeding.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Follow the record

Votes, people, money & the original source

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift70% confidence

PD Decoupling

The document reflects a trend of individual property owners seeking to decouple their land from larger, older Planned Development agreements to gain more flexibility.

Jay Tanner PD 19-0067