POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Contract Summary: Enterpulse Management Consulting

Original title: Contract 11046: ENTERPULSE — PRO SERV CONSULTING $250,000orABOVE (Chicago, IL)

Record date · August 4, 2011

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document outlines a management consulting contract between the City of Chicago and Enterpulse for and maintenance services. The agreement covered a period from 2006 through 2011.

Why it matters

The contract defines the scope of IT consulting and maintenance services provided by Enterpulse to the Chicago Department of Business & Information Services for a five-year period.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Enterpulse

The company was the contracted vendor for IT and management services for the City of Chicago.

Directly affected

Dept of Business & Information Services

The department oversaw the management consulting agreement and the associated application development work.

Key Facts

  • Contract number 11046 was established for professional management consulting services.
  • The contract scope included application development, support, and ongoing maintenance.
  • The contract period began on January 1, 2006.
  • The contract period ended on July 8, 2011.
Show all 7 facts
  • The contract was approved on August 4, 2011.
  • The listed award amount for this specific record is $0.
  • The vendor is based in Atlanta, Georgia.

Frequently Asked Questions

What services did Enterpulse provide to the city?
Enterpulse provided management consulting, specifically focused on , support, and ongoing maintenance.
Why is the award amount listed as $0?
The document does not specify the financial value of the contract, listing the award amount as $0.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

temporal pattern90% confidence

Retroactive Approval

The contract approval date (August 2011) occurred after the contract end date (July 2011), suggesting the approval was finalized after the service period concluded.

Connected Entities

Enterpulse, Dept of Business & Information Services, 125 Clairemont Ave Ste 200, Atlanta, GA, 30030 and 1 more
OrganizationEnterpulse“The vendor providing consulting services.”Map →
OrganizationDept of Business & Information Services“The Chicago city department managing the contract.”Map →
location125 Clairemont Ave Ste 200, Atlanta, GA, 30030“The business address of the vendor.”Map →
locationChicago, IL“The jurisdiction of the contract.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

data.cityofchicago.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance30
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record