POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut bill defines advance rental payments and regulates tenant security deposits

Original title: AN ACT DEFINING ADVANCE RENTAL PAYMENTS.

Last action · February 27, 2026: Public Hearing 03/03Sponsor: Rob Sampson

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 333 formally defines s, separates them from s, and allows tenants with lease terms of six months or longer to offer advance rent starting October 1, 2026. The measure also bans landlords from charging move-in or move-out fees and clarifies tenant remedies when essential services fail.

Why it matters

Establishes clear legal rules differentiating pre-paid rent from s, directly impacting how much money landlords can collect at the start of a residential lease and how unearned rent must be returned.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

residential tenants

Tenants can offer advance rent for leases of six months or longer, are protected from move-in and move-out fees, and have clarified rights when essential services fail.

Directly affected

landlords

Landlords must distinguish between advance rent and security deposits, cannot charge move-in or move-out fees, and must return unearned advance rent under specific conditions.

Directly affected

mobile manufactured home park residents

Residents of mobile manufactured home parks are included under the definitions and protections regarding essential service failures.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between an advance rental payment and a security deposit under this bill?
An is a payment intended to serve as partial or full payment of rent that is not yet due, whereas a is money held to reimburse the landlord for property damages, cleaning, or future rental defaults.
Who is eligible to offer an advance rental payment?
Any tenant with a rental agreement term equal to or longer than six months may offer an .
Are landlords allowed to charge move-in or move-out fees?
No, the bill explicitly prohibits landlords from charging a tenant any move-in or move-out fee.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 27, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/03
  2. Feb 26, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Housing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Formal separation of advance rent and security deposits

The bill removes advance rental payments from the definition of security deposits and establishes distinct statutory rules for handling them.

Connected Entities

Housing Committee, Sen. Rob Sampson, Banking Commissioner
OrganizationHousing Committee“Committee that introduced Senate Bill 333”Map →
PersonSen. Rob Sampson“Cosponsor representing the 16th District”Map →
PersonBanking Commissioner“Commissioner defined within the statutes regarding security deposits”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record