POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Ohio Bill Regulates Broadband Infrastructure in Public Rights-of-Way and Sets Removal Rules for Abandoned Utility Poles

Original title: Regards broadband service infrastructure in a public right-of-way

Last action · July 22, 2026: IntroducedSponsor: Roy Klopfenstein

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Ohio House Bill 979 requires broadband internet access providers to comply with local authority permitting, construction, and restoration standards when installing infrastructure in public rights-of-way. The measure mandates the removal of replaced utility poles within 90 days, establishes notification requirements for s, and permits local authorities to assess civil penalties and recover removal costs for abandoned equipment.

Why it matters

Local governments gain express statutory authority to regulate broadband construction timelines, enforce road restoration standards, remove abandoned utility poles, and recover inspection or removal costs from providers, impacting utility operations and municipal right-of-way management across Ohio.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Broadband internet access providers

Broadband providers must comply with local permitting, construction, design, and restoration standards, and are subject to permit suspensions, civil remedies, and cost recovery for noncompliance.

Directly affected

Utility appurtenance owners

Utility owners must adhere to a 90-day timeline for removing replaced utility poles, submit annual notices of future use for equipment, and face removal costs or tax assessments for abandoned structures.

Directly affected

Local authorities (municipalities, townships, counties)

Local authorities gain explicit statutory authority to establish permitting procedures, set reasonable fees, declare equipment abandoned, remove uncompliant infrastructure, and recover costs or levy civil penalties.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can local governments use these permits to regulate the prices charged for broadband internet?
No. The bill explicitly states that its provisions apply only to the management of local public rights-of-way and infrastructure and do not authorize the state or local authorities to regulate the rates, terms, or conditions of broadband internet access service.
What happens if a utility company leaves an old utility pole standing next to a newly installed pole?
This is classified as a '.' Attachments must be transferred and the old pole completely removed within 90 days after the new pole is installed, unless an extension is granted. Remaining past that period allows the local authority to declare it abandoned and remove it.
How long do utility owners have to submit an initial notice of future use for their utility appurtenances?
owners must provide an initial written notice of future use to each local authority where their appurtenances are located not later than 365 days after the effective date of the section.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

Coverage by outlet perspective1 article
Center 1
Blind spot - only covered by center outlets

Bias ratings based on AllSides / Media Bias/Fact Check

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jul 22, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Codified Right-of-Way Standards for Broadband

The bill creates a unified statutory framework across multiple sections of the Revised Code specifically tying broadband infrastructure to existing local right-of-way and county road protection statutes.

Connected Entities

Roy Klopfenstein
PersonRoy Klopfenstein“Representative, District 82, sponsoring House Bill 979”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legislature.ohio.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record