The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Congressional Hearing on CFPB Arbitration Rule Proposal
Record date · January 1, 2018
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document is a transcript record of a 2016 House subcommittee hearing regarding a proposed rule by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) that would limit the use of clauses in consumer financial contracts. The hearing featured testimony from legal experts and industry representatives debating whether the rule would effectively protect consumers or negatively impact the financial services market.
The hearing examined a proposed federal rule that would have restricted the ability of banks and financial companies to force consumers into private arbitration, potentially allowing more class-action lawsuits against financial institutions.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Financial Institutions
The proposed rule would limit their ability to include mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer agreements.
Consumers
The rule would change the legal venues available to them for resolving disputes with financial service providers.
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on May 18, 2016, before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit.
- The subject was the CFPB's proposed rulemaking regarding mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer financial contracts.
- The hearing included testimony from four primary witnesses representing legal, academic, and industry perspectives.
- The record includes extensive written statements from various trade associations, including the Credit Union National Association and the Electronic Transactions Association.
Show all 5 facts
- The hearing explored the tension between private arbitration and the right of consumers to participate in class-action litigation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is mandatory arbitration in a financial contract?
Why was the CFPB proposing a rule on this?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
CFPB Regulatory Expansion
The hearing highlights the CFPB's active use of its rulemaking authority to challenge long-standing industry practices regarding consumer contracts.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy80Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools