POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Save Healthcare Workers Act (H.R. 3178)

Original title: Save Healthcare Workers Act

Last action · May 5, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Sponsors: Madeleine Dean and 67 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill proposes a new federal crime for assaulting or intimidating hospital employees while they are performing their duties. It establishes specific prison sentences and fines for these offenses, with enhanced penalties for the use of weapons, causing , or committing the act during a declared public emergency.

Why it matters

If passed, this bill would create a new federal criminal offense for assaulting hospital staff, potentially leading to prison sentences of up to 20 years depending on the circumstances of the incident.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Hospital employees

They are the protected class under the proposed federal criminal statute.

Directly affected

Individuals accused of assaulting hospital staff

They would face potential federal prosecution and increased sentencing guidelines.

Directly affected

Federal, State, and local law enforcement

They would be tasked with investigating and prosecuting these crimes under the new federal framework.

Key Facts

  • Creates a new federal offense for knowingly assaulting hospital personnel during the performance of their duties.
  • Standard penalty for assault is a fine and/or imprisonment for up to 10 years.
  • Enhanced penalty of up to 20 years imprisonment and/or fines applies if a dangerous weapon is used or bodily injury occurs.
  • Enhanced penalty of up to 20 years imprisonment and/or fines applies if the assault occurs during a declared public emergency.
Show all 9 facts
  • Provides an affirmative defense if the defendant has a physical, mental, or intellectual disability and the conduct was a direct manifestation of that disability.
  • Applies to employees of hospitals and entities contracting with medical facilities.
  • Defines 'hospital' to include general hospitals, long-term care, rehabilitation, cancer, children's, critical access, and rural emergency hospitals.
  • Defines 'declaration of a public emergency' to include public health emergencies declared by the HHS Secretary or disasters declared by the President.
  • Congress justifies federal intervention by citing the impact of hospital violence on interstate commerce.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill cover all medical workers?
It covers individuals employed by a hospital or an entity contracting with a hospital or medical facility, specifically those defined under the Social Security Act.
What happens if the person who committed the assault has a disability?
The bill provides an if the defendant has a physical, mental, or intellectual disability and the conduct was a clear and direct manifestation of that disability.
Does this replace state laws regarding assault?
No, the bill notes that state and local authorities remain responsible for prosecuting the majority of violent crimes, but this bill adds a federal layer of jurisdiction.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. May 5, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  2. May 5, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 63 more sponsors
Eleanor NortonHouse · District 0DemocraticCosponsorNo profile match

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Federalization of Hospital Safety

The bill explicitly seeks to move beyond state-level prosecution by establishing federal jurisdiction, citing the economic impact of healthcare on interstate commerce.

Connected Entities

Supreme Court of the United States, Mariannette Miller-Meeks, Ms. Dean and 1 more
OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States“Cited in the bill's findings regarding interstate commerce.”Map →
PersonMariannette Miller-Meeks“Co-sponsor of the bill.”Map →
PersonMs. Dean“Representative from Pennsylvania who introduced the bill.”Map →
OrganizationBureau of Labor Statistics“Source of 2020 data regarding workplace violence in healthcare.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record