POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

House Subcommittee Hearing on 2018 National Security Space Priorities

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 115-46] HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing established the framework and priorities for the 2018 defense budget regarding space-based military and intelligence assets, which directly impacts federal spending and national security capabilities.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Department of Defense

The department's space policy and budget priorities for 2018 were subject to congressional oversight.

National Reconnaissance Office

The agency's leadership provided testimony regarding its operational posture and strategic priorities.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces held a hearing on May 19, 2017, to discuss the fiscal year 2018 priorities for the . The session included testimony from senior military and intelligence officials regarding the and strategic needs of U.S. space programs.

Key Facts

  • The hearing focused on the fiscal year 2018 priorities for the national security space enterprise.
  • The subcommittee held an unclassified session followed by a closed, secure session for sensitive oversight.
  • Steve Kitay, a professional staff member, concluded his tenure with the subcommittee to become the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy.
  • The hearing included testimony from five senior officials representing the Air Force, U.S. Strategic Command, the National Reconnaissance Office, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
  • The committee reviewed the posture of space domains in the context of the broader National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to review the priorities and current status of the as part of the fiscal year 2018 budget and process.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses included General John W. Raymond, Lieutenant General David J. Buck, Betty Sapp, Robert Cardillo, and John D. Hill.

Why It Matters

This hearing established the framework and priorities for the 2018 defense budget regarding space-based military and intelligence assets, which directly impacts federal spending and national security capabilities.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Staff Transition to Policy Role

The hearing notes the transition of a long-term committee staff member, Steve Kitay, directly into the role of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy, indicating a close alignment between committee staff and executive branch policy implementation.

Connected Entities

personSteve KitayFormer staff member transitioning to Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space PoMap →
personMike RogersChairman of the Subcommittee on Strategic ForcesMap →
personBetty SappDirector of the National Reconnaissance OfficeMap →
personJohn W. RaymondGeneral, Commander of Air Force Space CommandMap →
personJohn D. HillActing Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space PolicyMap →
personDavid J. BuckLieutenant General, Commander of Joint Functional Component Command for SpaceMap →
personRobert CardilloDirector of the National Geospatial-Intelligence AgencyMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record