POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing: Sovereign Immunity and Intellectual Property

Original title: SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SYSTEM

Record date · January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a 2017 House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing regarding the intersection of and the intellectual property system. The hearing focused on the practice of entities transferring patent rights to sovereign tribes to shield them from legal challenges.

Why it matters

The hearing examines whether allows patent holders to avoid legal challenges to their patents, which impacts the ability of competitors to contest patent validity in federal courts.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

St. Regis Mohawk Tribe

The tribe is involved in legal agreements where they assert sovereign immunity to protect patent rights.

Directly affected

Patent Holders

Entities that may use sovereign immunity agreements to defend their intellectual property from legal challenges.

Key Facts

  • The Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet held a hearing on November 7, 2017, regarding sovereign immunity in the IP system.
  • The St. Regis Mohawk Tribe declined an invitation to testify in person but submitted written testimony.
  • General Counsel for the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, Dale White, indicated the tribe's interest in pursuing additional sovereign immunity deals regarding patents.
  • The hearing included testimony from four expert witnesses: Karl Manheim, William Jay, Philip Johnson, and Christopher Mohr.
Show all 5 facts
  • The hearing was held in the Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, D.C.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core issue being discussed?
The hearing explores whether —a legal doctrine that protects sovereign entities from being sued—is being used to shield patent holders from legal challenges.
Did the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe participate?
The tribe declined to testify in person but provided written testimony that was entered into the official record.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Tribal Patent Shielding

The hearing highlights a deliberate strategy by some sovereign tribes to enter into agreements to provide immunity for patent holders.

Connected Entities

Karl Manheim, Dale White, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe and 5 more
PersonKarl Manheim“Witness, Professor of Law at Loyola Law School”Map →
PersonDale White“General counsel for the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe”Map →
OrganizationSt. Regis Mohawk Tribe“A tribe that entered into patent-related sovereign immunity agreements”Map →
PersonChristopher Mohr“Witness, Vice President for Intellectual Property at Software and Information In”Map →
PersonBob Goodlatte“Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary”Map →
PersonPhilip Johnson“Witness, Principal at Johnson-IP Strategy & Policy Consulting”Map →
PersonDarrell Issa“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet”Map →
PersonWilliam Jay“Witness, Partner at Goodwin Procter LLP”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record