POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Missouri bill classifies AI-generated court or administrative documents by unlicensed providers as the unauthorized practice of law

Original title: Modifies provisions relating to the unauthorized practice of law as it relates to the use of artificial intelligence

Last action · January 27, 2026: Second Read and Referred S General Laws CommitteeSponsor: Curtis Trent

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Unlicensed individuals, businesses, and organizations are prohibited from providing AI-generated legal papers, , or documents for court or administrative proceedings. Violators face misdemeanor charges, fines up to $100, and civil liability to repay triple the fees received.

Why it matters

Establishes legal penalties and enforcement mechanisms for using artificial intelligence to draft legal documents without a license, directly impacting unlicensed legal tech providers and individuals seeking low-cost document generation.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Unlicensed legal document providers

Prohibited from providing AI-generated court or administrative documents and subjected to misdemeanor penalties and civil liability.

Directly affected

General public and legal consumers

Subject to changed rules regarding who may legally supply AI-assisted documents for use in legal proceedings.

Directly affected

Missouri Attorney General

Tasked with the duty to institute suits necessary for the recovery of treble amounts on behalf of the state.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill apply if someone uses AI to draft legal documents for free?
Yes. The prohibition applies regardless of whether compensation is paid for providing the AI-generated papers, , or documents.
What are the penalties for violating this restriction?
Violators are guilty of a misdemeanor, subject to a fine up to $100 plus prosecution costs, and liable to pay back triple the amount charged for the service.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Jan 27, 2026SenateFloor
    Second Read and Referred S General Laws Committee
  2. Jan 7, 2026SenateIntroduced
    S First Read
  3. Dec 2, 2025Senate
    Prefiled

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. The text on record is the 5254S.01I - Introduced version. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Unauthorized Practice Statutes

The bill explicitly expands traditional unauthorized practice of law statutes to target machine-generated legal documents produced by artificial intelligence.

Connected Entities

Curtis Trent, General Assembly of the State of Missouri
PersonCurtis Trent“State Senator, District 20, introducing Senate Bill 1395”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly of the State of Missouri“Legislative body enacting the statute”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.senate.mo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record