Senate Hearing: Examination of Federal Rulemaking Processes
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing provides insight into the legislative oversight of federal agency regulations, which directly impacts how rules governing financial services and retirement savings are created and implemented.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Retirement savers
The fiduciary rule discussed in the hearing impacts the standards of conduct for financial advisors managing retirement accounts.
U.S. Department of Labor
The agency is responsible for the creation and implementation of the fiduciary rule under examination.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on April 20, 2016, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
- The committee reviewed the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule regarding retirement savings.
- Chairman Ron Johnson entered two Majority Staff reports and one Minority Staff memorandum into the record.
- The hearing included testimony from five expert witnesses representing legal, regulatory, and public interest perspectives.
- The committee formally acknowledged the absence of Senator Thomas R. Carper due to a family bereavement.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the primary purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
The hearing provides insight into the legislative oversight of federal agency regulations, which directly impacts how rules governing financial services and retirement savings are created and implemented.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Focus on Regulatory Oversight
The hearing highlights a 2016 legislative effort to increase scrutiny of agency rulemaking processes, particularly regarding financial regulations.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy50Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools