Hearing on Supercomputing and American Technology Leadership
January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing established the legislative focus for the 114th Congress Subcommittee on Energy regarding federal investment and policy priorities for infrastructure.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Technology Industry
Companies involved in high-performance computing are affected by federal policy and funding priorities discussed in the hearing.
Department of Energy
The agency's scientific computing advisory committees provide guidance that informs the subcommittee's legislative oversight.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on January 28, 2015, in Room 2318 of the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The hearing was the first chaired by Representative Randy K. Weber for the Subcommittee on Energy.
- The session focused on the impact of high-performance computing on American technological competitiveness.
- Witnesses included representatives from the Bipartisan Policy Center, the DOE Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee, IBM, and the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
- The committee authorized the participation of several members including Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Swalwell, Mr. Grayson, Ms. Esty, Mr. Veasey, and Ms. Clark.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing established the legislative focus for the 114th Congress Subcommittee on Energy regarding federal investment and policy priorities for infrastructure.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Early 114th Congress Focus
The hearing indicates that the 114th Congress prioritized supercomputing as a pillar of national technological competitiveness early in its session.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools