The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Lobbying Disclosure: Loma Management Services, LLC
Record date · July 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
Lawrence S. Adelson registered as a lobbyist representing Loma Management Services, LLC to seek financing from the Chicago City Council and Aldermen for the period of July 1, 2016, through September 30, 2016.
This document discloses that a private entity, Loma Management Services, LLC, formally engaged a lobbyist to influence city officials regarding financial matters during the third quarter of 2016.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Loma Management Services, LLC
The company is the client seeking financing from the city.
Chicago City Council / Aldermen
The council members are the targets of the lobbying effort regarding financing decisions.
Key Facts
- Lobbyist Lawrence S. Adelson represented client Loma Management Services, LLC.
- The lobbying activity targeted the Chicago City Council and Aldermen.
- The specific action sought by the lobbyist was financing.
- The lobbying period covered July 1, 2016, to September 30, 2016.
Show all 5 facts
- The action type is classified as administrative.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this document?
What does 'administrative' action mean in this context?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceLobbying Activity
LAWRENCE S. ADELSON
on behalf of LOMA MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
LAWRENCE S. ADELSON
on behalf of LOMA MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
LAWRENCE S. ADELSON
on behalf of LOMA MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
LAWRENCE S. ADELSON
on behalf of LOMA MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Connected Entities
Sources
data.cityofchicago.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
