POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HRES939FEDERALTabled - resolution did not advance
High Impact

Resolution to Impeach President Donald J. Trump

Original title: Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States for high crimes and misdemeanors.

December 10, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

This resolution did not advance - its current status is "Tabled - resolution did not advance".

Last action
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.Dec 11, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

This resolution initiates the formal constitutional process to remove the President from office, which would require a majority vote in the House of Representatives and a subsequent trial in the U.S. Senate.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Donald J. Trump

The President is the subject of the impeachment proceedings.

U.S. House of Representatives

The House is responsible for debating and voting on the articles of impeachment.

Federal Judiciary

The resolution addresses the safety and independence of federal judges in relation to presidential rhetoric.

What changed

Last recorded activity December 10, 2025.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This resolution, introduced by Representative Al Green, formally proposes the impeachment of President Donald J. Trump. It outlines two articles of impeachment, alleging abuse of power through threats against members of Congress and intimidation of the federal judiciary.

Key Facts

  • H. Res. 939 formally charges President Donald J. Trump with high crimes and misdemeanors.
  • Article I alleges the President abused his power by calling for the execution of six Democratic lawmakers who served in the military or intelligence communities.
  • The lawmakers targeted in Article I had released a video on November 18, 2025, urging military and intelligence personnel to refuse illegal orders.
  • Article II alleges the President abused his power by intimidating federal judges and undermining the independence of the judiciary.
  • The resolution cites a May 2, 2025, Reuters report where Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson stated that attacks on judges appear designed to intimidate the judiciary.
  • The resolution claims that roughly one-third of the federal judiciary received threats in 2025, correlating with the President's rhetoric.
  • The resolution was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary on December 10, 2025.

Why It Matters

This resolution initiates the formal constitutional process to remove the President from office, which would require a majority vote in the House of Representatives and a subsequent trial in the U.S. Senate.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens after this resolution is introduced?
The resolution has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary for consideration.
What are the specific charges against the President?
The charges are abuse of presidential power by calling for the execution of members of Congress and abuse of presidential power to intimidate federal judges.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Voting Record

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Escalation of Executive-Judicial Conflict

The document highlights a specific, documented increase in threats against the federal judiciary linked to presidential rhetoric in 2025.

Connected Entities

personAl GreenU.S. Representative from Texas who submitted the resolution.Map →
personDonald John TrumpPresident of the United States and subject of the impeachment resolution.Map →
personKetanji Brown JacksonU.S. Supreme Court Justice who commented on the impact of rhetoric on the judiciMap →
personBarack Hussein ObamaFormer President who appointed a judge referenced in the resolution.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance100
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy100
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment90
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz95
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record