The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Indiana SB 253 Establishes Deed Fraud Task Force and Grants County Recorders Authority to Block Suspicious Filings
Last action · January 8, 2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Local GovernmentSponsor: Greg Goode
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
County recorders in Indiana are authorized to refuse recording suspicious real estate instruments, report potential fraud to law enforcement, and notify notaries under Senate Bill 253. The legislation also mandates that every county establish free property and instrument alert notification systems for residents and notaries by January 1, 2027, while creating new background check requirements for notary applicants.
Property owners gain free access to alert systems tracking filings on their real estate, while county officials receive immunity from damages when rejecting fraudulent deeds. Victims of forged deeds or mortgages are granted specific civil causes of action to recover compensatory and punitive damages plus attorney fees.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
County recorders
County recorders gain authority to reject suspicious filings, are required to establish free property and instrument alert systems by January 1, 2027, and are granted immunity from liability for these actions.
Notaries public
Notaries face new background check requirements through the secretary of state, must show proof of commission to purchase stamping devices, and are empowered to refuse notarial acts if identity proofing is insufficient.
Property owners
Property owners gain free access to alert notification systems to track any recorded instruments affecting their real estate and receive new legal recourse against deed forgery.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What authority does a county recorder have when encountering a suspicious deed?
What remedies are available if someone is harmed by a forged deed or mortgage?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
2 actions- Jan 8, 2026SenateIntroducedFirst reading: referred to Committee on Local Government
- Jan 8, 2026SenateAuthored by Senator Goode
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Expanded County Recorder Authority
The bill shifts county recorders from passive recording agents to active screeners capable of refusing suspicious instruments unless overridden by a court.
Connected Entities
Sources
iga.in.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz35Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools