POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Rising Insulin Costs

Original title: PRICED OUT OF A LIFESAVING DRUG: GETTING ANSWERS ON THE RISING COST OF INSULIN

January 1, 2020

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal inquiry into the pricing practices of insulin manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers, which directly impacts the out-of-pocket costs for millions of Americans living with diabetes.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

People with diabetes

This group is directly affected by the retail price of insulin, which is the subject of the committee's investigation.

Pharmaceutical manufacturers

These companies are subject to congressional oversight regarding their pricing and business practices.

Pharmacy benefit managers

These entities are subject to congressional oversight regarding their role in the insulin supply chain and pricing.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2020.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House held a hearing on April 10, 2019, to examine the factors contributing to the rising costs of insulin. Representatives questioned executives from major pharmaceutical manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers regarding their pricing strategies and supply chain roles.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on April 10, 2019, by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  • The hearing focused on the rising cost of insulin and the roles of manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) in the supply chain.
  • Witnesses included executives from Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, CVS Health, Express Scripts, and Optumrx.
  • The committee requested and received written testimony and answers to follow-up questions from all participating witnesses.
  • The hearing record includes an article from The Boston Globe regarding protests at Sanofi concerning insulin prices.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The subcommittee aimed to investigate why the cost of insulin has risen and to understand the roles of pharmaceutical companies and pharmacy benefit managers in setting those prices.
Who testified at the hearing?
Executives from three major insulin manufacturers (Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi) and three major pharmacy benefit managers (CVS Health, Express Scripts, and Optumrx) provided testimony.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal inquiry into the pricing practices of insulin manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers, which directly impacts the out-of-pocket costs for millions of Americans living with diabetes.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Increased Congressional Scrutiny of PBMs

The inclusion of both manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers indicates a shift toward examining the entire supply chain rather than just manufacturer pricing.

Connected Entities

organizationExpress ScriptsPharmacy benefit manager represented by Amy BickerMap →
organizationOptumrxPharmacy benefit manager represented by Sumit DuttaMap →
organizationCVS HealthPharmacy benefit manager represented by Thomas M. MoriartyMap →
organizationEli Lilly and CompanyPharmaceutical manufacturer represented by Michael B. MasonMap →
personDiana DeGetteChair of the Subcommittee on Oversight and InvestigationsMap →
organizationNovo Nordisk Inc.Pharmaceutical manufacturer represented by Douglas J. LangaMap →
organizationSanofiPharmaceutical manufacturer represented by Kathleen W. TregoningMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record