POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on Federal Nominations (November 18, 2021)

Original title: NOMINATIONS OF ERIK A. HOOKS, HON. MICHAEL KUBAYANDA, LAUREL A. BLATCHFORD, HON. EBONY M. SCOTT, AND DONNALD W. TUNNAGE

January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing is a required step in the confirmation process for five federal officials who will oversee emergency management, postal regulation, federal financial management, and local judicial proceedings in Washington, D.C.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Nominees

The individuals are undergoing the formal confirmation process required to assume their respective federal or judicial offices.

Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

The committee members are responsible for vetting the nominees and recommending them for full Senate confirmation.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs held a hearing to consider the nominations of five individuals for key federal and judicial positions. The nominees include candidates for leadership roles at FEMA, the , the Office of Management and Budget, and the .

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on November 18, 2021, before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
  • Erik A. Hooks was nominated for Deputy Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
  • Michael Kubayanda was nominated for Commissioner of the Postal Regulatory Commission.
  • Laurel A. Blatchford was nominated for Controller of the Office of Federal Financial Management at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
  • Ebony M. Scott and Donald W. Tunnage were nominated for Associate Judge positions on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
  • The hearing included testimony from the nominees and opening statements from committee members.
  • The record includes biographical information, ethics letters, and pre/post-hearing questions for each nominee.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The purpose is to review the qualifications of presidential nominees for specific federal and judicial roles before the Senate votes on their confirmation.
Who were the nominees being considered?
The nominees were Erik A. Hooks (FEMA), Michael Kubayanda (), Laurel A. Blatchford (OMB), and Ebony M. Scott and Donald W. Tunnage (DC Superior Court).

Why It Matters

This hearing is a required step in the confirmation process for five federal officials who will oversee emergency management, postal regulation, federal financial management, and local judicial proceedings in Washington, D.C.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Multi-Agency Confirmation

The committee bundled nominations from vastly different sectors—emergency management, postal regulation, federal finance, and local judiciary—into a single hearing session.

Connected Entities

personLaurel A. BlatchfordNominee for Controller, Office of Federal Financial ManagementMap →
personMichael KubayandaNominee for Commissioner, Postal Regulatory CommissionMap →
personErik A. HooksNominee for Deputy Administrator, FEMAMap →
personEbony M. ScottNominee for Associate Judge, Superior Court of the District of ColumbiaMap →
personGary C. PetersChairman of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental AffairsMap →
personDonald W. TunnageNominee for Associate Judge, Superior Court of the District of ColumbiaMap →
personEleanor Holmes NortonDelegate in Congress from the District of ColumbiaMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record