POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Senate Hearing on Federal Nominations (November 18, 2021)

Original title: NOMINATIONS OF ERIK A. HOOKS, HON. MICHAEL KUBAYANDA, LAUREL A. BLATCHFORD, HON. EBONY M. SCOTT, AND DONNALD W. TUNNAGE

Record date · January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs held a hearing to consider the nominations of five individuals for key federal and judicial positions. The nominees include candidates for leadership roles at FEMA, the , the Office of Management and Budget, and the .

Why it matters

This hearing is a required step in the confirmation process for five federal officials who will oversee emergency management, postal regulation, federal financial management, and local judicial proceedings in Washington, D.C.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Nominees

The individuals are undergoing the formal confirmation process required to assume their respective federal or judicial offices.

Directly affected

Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

The committee members are responsible for vetting the nominees and recommending them for full Senate confirmation.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on November 18, 2021, before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
  • Erik A. Hooks was nominated for Deputy Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
  • Michael Kubayanda was nominated for Commissioner of the Postal Regulatory Commission.
  • Laurel A. Blatchford was nominated for Controller of the Office of Federal Financial Management at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Show all 7 facts
  • Ebony M. Scott and Donald W. Tunnage were nominated for Associate Judge positions on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
  • The hearing included testimony from the nominees and opening statements from committee members.
  • The record includes biographical information, ethics letters, and pre/post-hearing questions for each nominee.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The purpose is to review the qualifications of presidential nominees for specific federal and judicial roles before the Senate votes on their confirmation.
Who were the nominees being considered?
The nominees were Erik A. Hooks (FEMA), Michael Kubayanda (), Laurel A. Blatchford (OMB), and Ebony M. Scott and Donald W. Tunnage (DC Superior Court).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Multi-Agency Confirmation

The committee bundled nominations from vastly different sectors—emergency management, postal regulation, federal finance, and local judiciary—into a single hearing session.

Connected Entities

Laurel A. Blatchford, Michael Kubayanda, Erik A. Hooks and 4 more
PersonLaurel A. Blatchford“Nominee for Controller, Office of Federal Financial Management”Map →
PersonMichael Kubayanda“Nominee for Commissioner, Postal Regulatory Commission”Map →
PersonErik A. Hooks“Nominee for Deputy Administrator, FEMA”Map →
PersonEbony M. Scott“Nominee for Associate Judge, Superior Court of the District of Columbia”Map →
PersonEleanor Holmes Norton“Delegate in Congress from the District of Columbia”Map →
PersonGary C. Peters“Chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs”Map →
PersonDonald W. Tunnage“Nominee for Associate Judge, Superior Court of the District of Columbia”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record