POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

South Dakota Legislature modifies petition and signature requirements for local government and school district referendums

Original title: modify the requirements to refer an ordinance or resolution to the voters of a political subdivision.

Last action · March 10, 2026: Failed to concur, no committee appointedSponsors: Aaron Aylward and 9 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

House Bill 1323 standardizes the petition process for referring local ordinances, resolutions, and school district tax decisions to a public vote by establishing an alternative signature threshold of 2,500 registered voters or five percent of the total, whichever is fewer. The measure alters the calculation baseline for registered voters across counties, municipalities, and school districts and adjusts timelines and publication requirements for tax opt-outs.

Why it matters

Changes the legal threshold and procedures for residents seeking to challenge local government decisions, annexations, property tax increases, and school board policies through a public vote.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Registered voters in South Dakota

Registered voters gain a clearer alternative signature threshold of 2,500 signatures or five percent of voters for filing referendum petitions against local government and school district decisions.

Directly affected

County commissioners and municipal governing bodies

Local governing bodies face standardized petition timelines and clearer statutory definitions separating legislative actions subject to referendum from administrative actions.

Directly affected

School districts

School districts must follow updated publication, notice formatting, and petition timelines when implementing excess tax levies or altering board terms.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many signatures are required to place a local ordinance referendum on the ballot?
A petition must be signed by at least five percent of the registered voters in the jurisdiction, or 2,500 registered voters, whichever is fewer.
What is the deadline for filing a referendum petition after a local decision is published?
A petition must be filed within twenty days of the publication of the decision.
Can administrative decisions made by local governing bodies be challenged by a referendum?
No. s, such as executing existing plans or supervising programs and employees, are not subject to the process unless specifically authorized by code.
What types of local government actions are exempt from being referred to a vote?
Ordinances or resolutions necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health, safety, or support of existing public institutions, as well as those executing an already adopted plan or providing for supervision of programs and employees, cannot be referred.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

13 actions
  1. Mar 10, 2026HouseFloor
    Failed to concur, no committee appointed
  2. Mar 9, 2026SenateCommittee
    Do Pass Amended
  3. Mar 9, 2026Senate
    Motion to amend
  4. Mar 4, 2026SenateCommittee
    Do Pass Amended
  5. Mar 4, 2026Senate
    Motion to amend
  6. Mar 4, 2026Senate
    Scheduled for hearing
Show 7 earlier actions
  1. Feb 23, 2026SenateIntroduced
    First read in Senate and referred to
  2. Feb 20, 2026HouseCommittee
    Do Pass Amended
  3. Feb 20, 2026House
    Motion to amend
  4. Feb 18, 2026HouseCommittee
    Do Pass
  5. Feb 18, 2026House
    Scheduled for hearing
  6. Feb 6, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to
  7. Feb 4, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First Reading House

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Motion succeededHouse3/10/2026South Dakota LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Failed to concur, no committee appointed

Total

70

Yes
40
No
27
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0
Other positions
3
Show 1 earlier roll call
Motion succeededHouse2/20/2026South Dakota LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Do Pass Amended

Total

70

Yes
39
No
28
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0
Other positions
3

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Standardization of Petition Thresholds

The legislation introduces a uniform alternative cap of 2,500 signatures for referendum petitions across counties, municipalities, school districts, and special zoning areas.

Connected Entities

Bobbi Andera, Tom Pischke, Kathy Rice and 8 more
PersonBobbi Andera“Co-sponsor”Map →
PersonTom Pischke“Co-sponsor”Map →
PersonKathy Rice“Co-sponsor”Map →
OrganizationSouth Dakota Legislature“Passed House Bill 1323”Map →
PersonLauren Nelson“Co-sponsor”Map →
PersonTravis Ismay“Co-sponsor”Map →
PersonTaffy Howard“Co-sponsor of House Bill 1323”Map →
PersonHeather Baxter“Co-sponsor”Map →
PersonDylan Jordan“Co-sponsor”Map →
PersonRepresentative Aylward“Introduced House Bill 1323”Map →
PersonCarl Perry“Co-sponsor”Map →

Sources

Open source document

sdlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record