POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut requires utility pole owners and users to clear double poles by October 2027

Original title: AN ACT CONCERNING REPORTING OF DOUBLE UTILITY POLES.

Last action · April 7, 2026: File Number 471Sponsors: Nick Gauthier and 32 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

The Connecticut General Assembly passed a bill requiring public utility pole owners and equipment users to transfer wires and remove by October 1, 2027. Under the measure, pole users must transfer equipment within 15 days of receiving notice of pole replacement, and the may levy civil penalties up to $100 per day for noncompliance.

Why it matters

Local residents face potential street clutter and safety concerns from lingering , while pole users and electric companies face strict new deadlines and daily financial penalties for failing to clear them.

Background
  • Double utility poles occur when a replacement pole is installed alongside an existing one during infrastructure upgrades, but the old pole remains in place because utility companies or third-party attachment users have not yet transferred their wires. context
  • The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) regulates rates and services of Connecticut's investor-owned electric and telephone utilities, including Eversource and United Illuminating. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Electric distribution companies

Electric companies must follow strict 15-day deadlines to transfer their own equipment and remove old poles after user completion, and maintain records of double poles.

Directly affected

Telephone companies

Telephone companies are subject to replacement and removal deadlines, written notice obligations, and potential daily civil penalties for noncompliance.

Directly affected

Utility pole equipment users

Cable, broadband, and other third-party equipment users must transfer their equipment within 15 days of receiving notice or face having pole owners do the work and bill them at prevailing wage rates.

Directly affected

Public Utilities Regulatory Authority

PURA is authorized to oversee reporting lists, adopt regulations, and issue civil penalties of up to $100 per day for violations.

Key Facts

  • Owners of public utility poles must deliver written notice of planned removal and replacement work to each pole user at least 72 hours before work begins, or after completion for emergency hazardous work.
  • Utility pole equipment users must transfer their equipment from an existing pole to a replacement pole within 15 days of receiving notice.
  • If a user fails to transfer equipment within 15 days, the pole owner may complete the transfer work on the user's behalf and bill them based on prevailing wage rates.
  • Electric distribution companies and telephone companies must transfer their own equipment and remove replaced poles within 15 days after receiving notice that all users have completed their transfers.
Show all 9 facts
  • Beginning October 1, 2026, utility pole owners must compile and maintain a list of double utility poles that have existed for at least 30 days and provide it to the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority upon request.
  • By October 1, 2027, all double utility poles must be eliminated by their owners.
  • The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority may impose civil penalties of up to $100 per day for each violation of the transfer, removal, or reporting requirements.
  • Civil penalties collected under the bill are remitted to the Commissioner of Social Services to fund the Connecticut Energy Assistance Program.
  • Utility pole users are exempt from civil penalties if prevented from transferring equipment solely due to a municipality's failure to timely remove municipal equipment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a double utility pole under this bill?
A double utility pole is a replacement utility pole built alongside or attached to an existing pole where the old pole has not yet been removed after wires were transferred.
How long do equipment users have to move their wires to a new pole?
Users have 15 days after receiving written notice of pole replacement work to complete the equipment transfer.
Where do collected civil penalties go?
Civil penalties collected for violations are remitted to the Commissioner of Social Services to support the Connecticut Energy Assistance Program.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the Senate floor.

Procedural history

9 actions
  1. Apr 7, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 471
  2. Apr 7, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 283
  3. Apr 7, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  4. Apr 7, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  5. Mar 30, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/07/26 12:00 PM
  6. Mar 20, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
Show 3 earlier actions
  1. Mar 19, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable Substitute
  2. Mar 6, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/12
  3. Mar 5, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Energy and Technology

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 28 more sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

financial connection99% confidence

Penalty Revenue Dedicated to Energy Assistance

Civil penalties collected from utility companies and users for failing to clear poles are directly channeled to fund the Connecticut Energy Assistance Program.

Connected Entities

Public Utilities Regulatory Authority, Rep. Mary M. Mushinsky, United Illuminating and 14 more
OrganizationPublic Utilities Regulatory Authority“Regulatory body tasked with overseeing utility pole compliance and penalties”Map →
PersonRep. Mary M. Mushinsky“Cosponsor of SB 421 representing the 85th District”Map →
OrganizationUnited Illuminating“Electric distribution company operating in Connecticut”Map →
PersonSen. Rick Lopes“Cosponsor of SB 421 representing the 6th District”Map →
OrganizationEversource“Electric distribution company operating in Connecticut”Map →
PersonSen. MD Rahman“Cosponsor of SB 421 representing the 4th District”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Connecticut legislative body passing the bill”Map →
PersonSen. Needleman“Chairperson of the Energy and Technology Committee”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Social Services“Recipient of remitted civil penalty funds for energy assistance”Map →
PersonSen. Jorge Cabrera“Cosponsor of SB 421 representing the 17th District”Map →
PersonSen. Ceci Maher“Cosponsor of SB 421 representing the 26th District”Map →
PersonRep. Nick Gauthier“Cosponsor of SB 421 representing the 38th District”Map →
OrganizationEnergy and Technology Committee“Legislative committee reporting the substitute bill”Map →
PersonRep. Kara Rochelle“Cosponsor of SB 421 representing the 104th District”Map →
PersonRep. Kerry S. Wood“Cosponsor of SB 421 representing the 29th District”Map →
PersonRep. Geoff Luxenberg“Cosponsor of SB 421 representing the 12th District”Map →
PersonRep. Amy Morrin Bello“Cosponsor of SB 421 representing the 28th District”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record