POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Louisiana extends financial benefits to surviving spouses of reserve law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty

Original title: LAW ENFORCE/OFFICERS: Extends surviving spouse benefits for a reserve officer killed in the line of duty (EN +$250,000 GF EX See Note)

Last action · June 2, 2026: Effective date: 08/01/2026.Sponsors: Debbie Villio and 30 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Louisiana law now guarantees surviving spouses and children of commissioned, reserve, or auxiliary law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty are eligible for financial security payments if the death occurs while traveling to or from an emergency, a public safety response, or their authorized work area in an agency vehicle.

Why it matters

Qualifying surviving spouses and children of reserve or auxiliary officers newly become eligible for state financial security payments when a fatal incident occurs during specific transit or emergency response conditions, carrying an estimated state general fund expenditure impact of $250,000.

Background
  • House Bill 12 was introduced during the 2026 Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature and signed into law as Act 608 by the Governor. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

reserve and auxiliary law enforcement officers

Their surviving spouses and children become explicitly eligible for financial security payments if the officer is killed while traveling to emergencies or commuting in agency vehicles.

Directly affected

surviving spouse or child of a law enforcement officer

They gain entitlement to statutory line-of-duty death benefit payments under expanded service and travel conditions.

Key Facts

  • Act 608 amends R.S. 40:1665.2(F) to extend survival benefits to reserve and auxiliary law enforcement officers.
  • Surviving spouses or children of commissioned reserve or auxiliary officers killed in the line of duty are entitled to payments provided in Paragraph (C)(1) of the statute.
  • Eligibility applies if the officer was traveling to or from a public safety emergency or responding to a public safety, health, or welfare assistance request.
  • Eligibility also applies if the officer was traveling between their residence and authorized work area using an employing agency's law enforcement vehicle.
Show all 6 facts
  • The measure carries an estimated state general fund expenditure increase of $250,000.
  • The designated effective date for the statutory change is August 1, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is newly covered under the updated surviving spouse benefit law?
Commissioned, reserve, and auxiliary law enforcement officers certified by the are covered if killed under qualifying transit or emergency response conditions.
What travel conditions qualify a reserve officer's family for benefits under this Act?
Qualifying travel includes journeying to or from a public safety emergency, responding to a public safety assistance request, or traveling between home and an authorized work area in an official law enforcement vehicle.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

20 actions
  1. Jun 2, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 608.
  2. Jun 2, 2026House
    Effective date: 08/01/2026.
  3. May 27, 2026SenateEnrolled
    Signed by the President of the Senate.
  4. May 27, 2026House
    Sent to the Governor for executive approval.
  5. May 26, 2026House
    Received from the Senate without amendments.
  6. May 26, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Enrolled and signed by the Speaker of the House.
Show 14 earlier actions
  1. May 25, 2026SenateFloor
    Rules suspended. Read by title, passed by a vote of 38 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
  2. May 20, 2026SenateFloor
    Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.
  3. May 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
  4. May 18, 2026SenateCommittee
    Reported favorably.
  5. Apr 28, 2026SenateCommittee
    Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Finance.
  6. Apr 27, 2026HouseFloor
    Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 102, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
  7. Apr 27, 2026Senate
    Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
  8. Apr 23, 2026House
    Scheduled for floor debate on 04/27/2026.
  9. Apr 22, 2026HouseFloor
    Read by title, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
  10. Apr 21, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported favorably (15-0).
  11. Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
  12. Jan 23, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 1/23/2026.
  13. Jan 16, 2026House
    Prefiled.
  14. Jan 16, 2026HouseCommittee
    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 26 more sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

financial connection95% confidence

State Fiscal Impact Identified

The enrolled bill explicitly notes an estimated expenditure increase of $250,000 from the state general fund.

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record